Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 653-656. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.06.019

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Safety evaluation of single incision plus one port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer

Bo Ma1,(), Jun Zhou2, Jiangang Li1, Jun Wang1   

  1. 1. Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang 830063, China
    2. Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University stomach enterochirurgia, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-10-29 Online:2021-12-26 Published:2022-01-20
  • Contact: Bo Ma
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2019D02C256); Hospital Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University(20190215); Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Science and Technology Department(2018ZC0181)

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the safety and feasibility of single-port + 1-port (SILS+ 1) laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 41 patients with SILS+ 1 laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer admitted from January 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, who were assigned to the SILS+ 1 group. Clinical data of 68 patients who received five-hole laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer from January to December 2018 were included for comparison, and they were assigned to the five-hole group. Statistical software SPSS 24.0 was used for data analysis, operation related indicators, VAS score and other measurement data were expressed by (±s), independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups. Postoperative complications were tested by χ2 test. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

The operation time of the SILS+ 1 group was slightly longer than that of the Five hole group, postoperative abdominal drainage tube extraction time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the Five hole group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissection and hospitalization cost between 2 groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications was 4.9% in the SILS+ 1 group and 5.9% in the Five hole group group. The VAS scores of SILS+ 1 group at 12 h, 1 d, 2 d and 3 d after surgery were significantly lower than those of the five-well group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the five-hole method, it is safe and feasible to perform SILS+ 1 laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer under abundant laparoscopic operation techniques.

Key words: Stomach neoplasms, Laparoscopes, Gastrectomy, Safety, Single-port plus one-port

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd