Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01): 38-41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.01.012

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Comparison of therapeutic effects and prognosis between two surgical methods for patients with stones in the middle and lower segments of the common bile duct combined with acute cholangitis

Shun Xu, Han Wang, Tao Hu, Mengjia Qian, Yiyao Cui, Xinhao Chen()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital (The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing Jiangsu Province 211100, China
  • Received:2025-09-28 Online:2026-02-26 Published:2026-01-16
  • Contact: Xinhao Chen
  • Supported by:
    Special Project of Health Science and Technology Development in Nanjing in 2024(YKK24225); Research and Development Fund Project of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University in 2023(KD2023KYJJ261)

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy and impact on patient prognosis of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone removal (LCBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of common bile duct middle and lower segment stones combined with acute cholangitis.

Methods

The clinical data of 113 patients with common bile duct middle and lower segment stones combined with acute cholangitis from January 2023 to December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the LCBDE group (treated with LCBDE) and the ERCP group (treated with ERCP) based on the surgical method. Fifty-four patients were selected from each group using the propensity score matching method. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0 software to process the data. The Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 or t test were used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The stone clearance rates in the LCBDE group and the ERCP group were 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative defecation time, recovery activity time and hospital stay of the ERCP group were shorter than those of the LCBDE group (P<0.05). On the 3rd day after surgery, the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), heparin-binding protein (HBP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and bilirubin (TBIL) in both groups were lower than those before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

LCBDE and ERCP have comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of common bile duct middle and lower segment stones combined with acute cholangitis, and ERCP has more advantages in shortening the perioperative period and reducing intraoperative bleeding.

Key words: Choledocholithiasis, Cholecystitis, Acute, Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Prognosis

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-66721881; 010-64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd