Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05): 513-516. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.05.010

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy via different approaches for advanced distal gastric cancer

Yuhao Jia1, Kunyu Lv2, Zhiqiang Liu2, Baozhong Li2,()   

  1. 1Clinical School of Henan University of Science and Technology (First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology), Luoyang Henan Province 471000, China
    2Department of Surgery, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang Henan Province 455000, China
  • Received:2024-09-27 Online:2025-10-26 Published:2025-08-05
  • Contact: Baozhong Li
  • Supported by:
    Henan Province Science and Technology Research Fund Project(242102310187)

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy via different approaches in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 92 patients with advanced distal gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy from April 2020 to April 2023 were retrospectively collected. According to different surgical approaches, they were divided into the right-sided group (n=47) and the left-sided group (n=45). SPSS25.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Measurement data such as clinical data were described by (±s), and t test was performed; enumeration data such as gender were described by [cases (%)], and chi-square test was performed. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival of patients 12 months after operation.

Results

the operation time of the right-sided group was shorter than that of the left-sided group, and the number of lymph nodes dissected was more than that of the left-sided group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in postoperative exhaust, out-of-bed activity, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The tests of group, time point, and interaction effect between group and time point of C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6 in the right-sided group were lower than those in the left-sided group at 3 days and 7 days after operation (P<0.05). The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and CA125 in the two groups were lower than those before operation at 1 week after operation, but there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the survival of the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The left-sided approach and the right-sided approach can achieve comparable survival at 12 months after operation, but compared with the left-sided approach, the right-sided approach can increase the number of lymph nodes dissected in laparoscopic-assisted radical distal resection, shorten the operation time, and reduce the degree of perioperative inflammatory response.

Key words: Advanced Distal Gastric Cancer, Radical Distal Gastrectomy, Laparoscopes, Lymph Nody Excision

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd