Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 628-630. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.06.026

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the clinical effect of different stripping and traction assisted ESD in the treatment of early esophageal cancer

Jianqiang Guo1,(), Yanjie Niu2, Bin Zhou3, Hui Wang4   

  1. 1. Xi'an Fourth Hospital Xi'an, Shaanxi 710004
    2. Xianyang First People's Hospital Xianyang, Shaanxi 712000
    3. Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an, Shaanxi 710004
    4. Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Jiangxi Nanchang 330008
  • Received:2020-03-03 Online:2020-12-26 Published:2020-12-26
  • Contact: Jianqiang Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Jianqiang, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and technology research project of social development in shaanxi province(2019SF072); Research project of shaanxi provincial health and family planning commission in 2018(18PJ139)

Abstract:

Objective

To study the clinical effect of different stripping and traction assisted ESD in the treatment of early esophageal cancer.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2018, 60 patients with esophageal early cancer and precancerous lesions were selected and divided into two groups, 30 in each group. The patients in group A were treated with floss assisted traction while those in group B were treated with rubber band assisted traction. The measurement data of operation time, traction device time and complete stripping time of the two groups were expressed as (±s), and independent sample t test was used. [n(%)]was used to count the postoperative complications, and χ2 test was used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference between group A and group B in terms of operation time, traction device time, complete stripping time and average hospitalization time (P>0.05). Group A had 8 times of bleeding clip shedding(26.7%), which was significantly higher than group B with 2 times (6.7%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was 13.3% in group A and 10.0% in group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was (10.2±3.4) d in group A and (9.7±3.1) d in group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up for 12 months. There was no recurrence or death in the two groups.

Conclusion

Both kinds of traction technology can effectively assist ESD operation and provide a good surgical field for it. Each has its own characteristics, which can be selected according to clinical needs.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Traction, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Comparative effectiveness research

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd