Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 277-280. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.03.018

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical analysis of modified D2 laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with a small incision for gastric cancer

Jing Chen1, Wenxiu Zhou1, Bo Song1, Yanfeng Niu2, Xiaoming Lu2, Wanli Zhang2, Yong Xiao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General surgery, Wuhan Red Cross Hospital, Hubei 430015, China
    2. Department of General surgery, the affiliated Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei 430022, China
  • Received:2019-05-22 Online:2020-06-26 Published:2020-06-26
  • Contact: Yong Xiao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xiao Yong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(WJ2015MB075)

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the clinical effect and safety of modified D2 laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with a small incision (MLADG) for gastric cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 90 cases of D2 laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy were analyzed from March 2014 to December 2015. According to different operative methods, patients were divided into MLADG group (45 cases) and LADG group (45 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS21.0 software. Measurement data such as Perioperative indicators and surgical indicators were represented as (±s) and were examined by using independent t test. Postoperative complications were analyzed by using χ2 test. Kaplan-meier method was used for survival analysis. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistical significant difference.

Results

The amount of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of CO2 pneumoperitoneum, the time of ambulation, the time and blood loss during the dissection of NO.6 lymph nodes in MLADG group were significantly better than those in LADG group respectively (P<0.05); There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of postoperative complications(15.6% vs. 13.3%), P>0.05. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of the 3-year cumulative survival rate of 68.9% (31/45) in MLADG group VS. 66.7% (30/45) in LADG group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

MLADG is safe and feasible, in line with the principle of radical resection of distal gastric cancer. Compared with LADG, MLADG has less total operation time, less time of the dissection of NO.6 lymph nodes with less blood loss, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Stomach neoplasms, Laparoscopes, Gastrectomy, Modified auxiliary small incision, Safety

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd