Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 223-225. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the secondary bile duct operation of patients with choledocholithiasis

Haopeng Teng1, Lin Zeng1,()   

  1. 1. Huainan First People’s Hospital of Anhui Province, General Surgery, Anhui232001, China
  • Received:2017-09-03 Online:2018-06-26 Published:2018-06-26
  • Contact: Lin Zeng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zeng Lin, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Heilongjiang science and technology program task book(number GC09C409-2)

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effect of Laparoscopic Lithotomy and Open Laparotomy in the secondary bile duct operation of patients with choledocholithiasis.

Methods

Fifty cases with recurrent choledocholithiasis treated in our hospital from February 2014 to May 2017 were analyzed. They were randomly divided into laparoscopic group and open group with 25 cases in each group. SPSS21.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Preoperative and postoperative measurement data were showed as (±s) deviation, compared with independent t test; Postoperative 24 h incidence of pain and postoperative complications were compared with χ2 test, P<0.05 indicated the difference was statistically significant.

Results

After surgery, The bleeding volume (P=0.004), gastrointestinal function recovery time (P=0.021), 24 h pain incidence (P=0.021) and hospitalization time (P=0.007) in laparoscopic group were significantly lower than those in laparotomy group. However, the operation time (P=0.028) and the total cost of patients (P= 0.046) in laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in laparotomy group. After surgery, the incidence of complications in the laparotomy group was significantly higher than that in the laparoscopy group(36% vs. 12%, P=0.037). The clinical effective rate of the two groups was 100%.

Conclusion

The clinical efficacy of laparoscopic secondary biliary surgery and open secondary biliary surgery is similar, however, the incidence of postoperative complications of laparoscopic secondary biliary surgery is lower. Laparoscopic secondary biliary surgery is more safe and effective.

Key words: Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Second-Look Surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd