切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 431 -434. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.05.023

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体即刻置入术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床研究
赵启生1,(), 钦传辉1, 杨贵义1   
  1. 1. 441300 湖北随州,随州市中心医院,湖北医药学院附属随州医院普外三科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2018-10-26
  • 通信作者: 赵启生

Clinical study of modified radical with nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate prosthesis implantation for early stage breast cancer

Qisheng Zhao1,(), Chuanhui Qin1, Guiyi Yang1   

  1. 1. Suizhou Central Hospital, Third general surgery department of Suizhou Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College, Suizhou, Hubei 441300
  • Received:2017-12-27 Published:2018-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Qisheng Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Qingsheng, Email:
引用本文:

赵启生, 钦传辉, 杨贵义. 保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体即刻置入术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 431-434.

Qisheng Zhao, Chuanhui Qin, Guiyi Yang. Clinical study of modified radical with nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate prosthesis implantation for early stage breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 431-434.

目的

观察保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体即刻置入术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析93例乳腺癌患者的临床资料,根据患者手术方案不同分为假体置入组(采取改良根治术联合假体置入术,n=48)与传统手术组(行传统改良根治术,n=45)。应用统计学软件SPSS19.0处理数据,两组年龄、肿瘤直径、体重指数采用(±s)表示,行独立样本t检验;TNM分期、乳房外观优良率、术后心理状况及生活质量、并发症总发生率采取χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

假体置入组与传统手术组并发症总发生率分别为25.0%与20.0%(P>0.05)。假体置入组术后3个月的乳房外观优良率为93.8%,显著高于传统手术组77.8%(P<0.05)。假体置入组术后6个月的焦虑、抑郁、恐惧、人际敏感、自我形象紊乱发生率分别为25%、16.7%、31.3%、20.8%、14.6%,显著低于传统手术组的46.7%、35.6%、53.3%、40%、33.3%(P<0.05)。两组2年无瘤生存率、随访期间复发率、转移率、死亡率均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

保留乳头乳晕的改良根治术联合假体置入术治疗早期乳腺癌可满足患者乳房重建的需求,不影响根治效果且提高了患者乳房外形美观度,患者术后心理与生活质量得到改善,值得推广。

Objective

To observe the clinical value of modified radical with nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate prosthesis implantation for early stage breast cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 93 patients with early stage breast cancer treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into prosthesis implantation group (treated with modified radical mastectomy and immediate prosthesis implantation, n=48) and traditional surgery group (treated with traditional modified radical mastectomy, n=45) according to the different surgical procedures. The data was analyzed using the statistical software SPSS19.0. The age, tumor diameter, body mass index of the two groups were adopted by (±s) and compared by the independent sample t test; The TNM stage, the excellent and good rate of breast appearance, postoperative mental status and quality of life, total incidence of complications of the two groups were compared by χ2 test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The total complication rate in the prosthesis implantation group and the traditional surgery group were 25.0% and 20.0% (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of breast appearance in the prosthesis implantation group was 93.8% at 3 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher than 77.8% in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). The incidence of anxiety, depression, fear, interpersonal sensitivity and self-image disorder in the prosthesis implantation group were 25%, 16.7%, 31.3%, 20.8%, 14.6% at 6 months after operation, which were significantly lower than 46.67% and 46.7%, 35.6%, 53.3%, 40%, 33.3% in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in the 2-year disease-free survival rate, the recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate, mortality rate during follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The modified radical with nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate prosthesis implantation in the treatment of early breast cancer can meet the needs of patients with breast reconstruction, which does not affect the curative effect and can improve the aesthetic of breast appearance, improve the patient’s postoperative psychological and quality of life, is worthy of promoting.

表1 93例乳腺癌患者不同术式两组的基线资料比较(±s)
表2 93例乳腺癌患者不同术式两组的并发症发生率比较(例)
表3 93例乳腺癌患者不同术式的术后3个月两组乳房外观比较[例(%)]
表4 93例乳腺癌患者不同术式两组的心理及生活质量比较[例(%)]
表5 88例乳腺癌患者不同术式两组的随访结果比较[例(%)]
[1]
陈亚,张强,刘铁成.保乳术-乳腺癌外科治疗的发展方向[J].安徽医学,2017,38(2):246-249.
[2]
阮淼,水若鸿.乳腺癌乳头乳晕复合体受侵犯的相关临床病理因素[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(5):361-366.
[3]
黄湛,杨传盛,张诠,等.保留乳头乳晕复合体的改良根治术对早期乳腺癌的疗效研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2013,28(3):256-259.
[4]
Santanelli di Pompeo F, Laporta R, Sorotos M, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: proposal for a monitoring protocol[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 136(2):144e-151e.
[5]
Shah A, Patel A, Kenler A, et al. An oncoplastic approach to reconstruct upper pole partial mastectomy defects in minimally ptotic and average size breasts[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 136(2):283e-284e.
[6]
共识专家讨论组.保留乳头乳晕复合体乳房切除术的专家共识与争议(2015年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(5):476-479.
[7]
Silva AK, Lapin B, Yao KA, et al. The effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on perioperative complications in women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a NSQIP analysis[J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(11):3474-3480.
[8]
李文斌,汤晗,邹洁雅,等.保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术治疗乳腺癌的安全性[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2017,44(1):49-52.
[9]
杨卓涛,杨景先,陈晓峰,等.保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术与传统乳腺癌改良根治术的临床疗效对比[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(3):218-221.
[10]
关山,王宇,张开通,等.应用皮肤悬吊系统腔镜下保留乳头乳晕乳腺切除即刻乳房重建[J].中华外科杂志,2017,55(2):126-129.
[11]
张晖,王圣应,彭德峰,等.保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术159例报告[J].中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(9):751-754.
[12]
杨奕,陈益定.保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术中乳头乳晕的血供特点及其评估[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(5):372-377.
[13]
王玮,朱丽.保留乳头乳晕复合体乳房切除术的手术切口设计[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(5):367-371.
[14]
俞晓立,郭小毛.保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳腺癌切除术中放疗的地位探讨[J].中国癌症杂志,2016,26(5):378-382.
[15]
徐海滨,杨欧欧,胡祖健,等.乳腺癌保留乳头乳晕乳腺切除即刻假体重建随访分析[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(10):1779-1781.
[16]
金功圣,韩福生,王圣应,等.保留乳头乳晕复合体乳癌术后即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造[J].中国普通外科杂志,2012,21(5):511-515.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?