切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (04) : 405 -408. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.04.015.

论著

ESD治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤与大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床效果对比研究
杨梦媛1, 白启轩1, 赵晓琳1, 黄坤1, 李珍1, 曹世长1, 程建平1,()   
  1. 1. 100123 北京,民航总医院消化肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-07 出版日期:2025-08-26
  • 通信作者: 程建平
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度民航医学中心(民航总医院)科研课题(202216)

A comparative study on the clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of intraluminal protruding colorectal tumors and laterally spreading tumors of the large intestine

Mengyuan Yang1, Qixuan Bai1, Xiaolin Zhao1, Kun Huang1, Zhen Li1, Shichang Cao1, Jianping Cheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Digestive Oncology, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100123, China
  • Received:2024-08-07 Published:2025-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianping Cheng
引用本文:

杨梦媛, 白启轩, 赵晓琳, 黄坤, 李珍, 曹世长, 程建平. ESD治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤与大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 405-408.

Mengyuan Yang, Qixuan Bai, Xiaolin Zhao, Kun Huang, Zhen Li, Shichang Cao, Jianping Cheng. A comparative study on the clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of intraluminal protruding colorectal tumors and laterally spreading tumors of the large intestine[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 405-408.

目的

了解内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤与大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床效果,并分析影响ESD完整性切除率的危险因素。

方法

前瞻性选取2022年1月至2024年1月行ESD治疗的≥20mm侧向发育型结直肠肿瘤患者50例(A组),及≥20mm腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤患者50例(B组)作为研究对象。采用SPSS 25.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。计量资料以()表示,采用独立样本t检验; 计数资料以[例(%)]表示,运用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法进行比较;采用多因素Logistic回归分析ESD不完整切除的影响因素。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者的纤维化分型、ESD手术时间、整块切除率及ESD相关并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组患者完整切除率及治愈性切除率较B组患者高(P<0.05);单因素结果显示,结直肠肿瘤ESD完整性切除率与患者肿瘤病变形态及纤维化分型显著相关(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果显示腔内突出型肿瘤、F2型纤维化是结直肠肿瘤ESD发生非完整性切除的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

ESD治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤的临床效果较好,腔内突出型肿瘤和F2型纤维化是造成结直肠肿瘤非完整性切除的危险因素。

Objective

To understand the clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) in the treatment of intraluminal protruding colorectal tumors and laterally spreading tumors of the large intestine, and to analyze the risk factors affecting the complete resection rate of ESD.

Methods

Prospectively,50 patients with laterally spreading colorectal tumors with a diameter of ≥ 20 mm (group A) and 50 patients with intraluminal protruding colorectal tumors with a diameter of ≥ 20 mm (group B) who underwent ESD treatment from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. Measurement data were expressed as () and analyzed by independent sample t test; Enumeration data were expressed as[ cases (%)]and compared by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability method; Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of incomplete ESD resection. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in the fibrosis classification, ESD operation time, en bloc resection rate, and ESD-related complications between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); The complete resection rate and curative resection rate of patients in group A were higher than those in group B (P<0.05);The results of univariate analysis showed that the complete resection rate of ESD for colorectal tumors was significantly correlated with the morphological characteristics of the tumor lesions and the fibrosis classification of the patients (P<0.05); The results of Logistic regression analysis showed that intraluminal protruding tumors and F2-type fibrosis were independent risk factors for incomplete ESD resection of colorectal tumors (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ESD has a good clinical efficacy in the treatment of intraluminal protruding colorectal tumors.Intraluminal protruding tumors and F2-type fibrosis are risk factors for incomplete resection of colorectal tumors.

表1 两组结直肠肿瘤患者一般资料对比
表2 两组结直肠肿瘤患者临床特征及治疗结局比较
表3 结直肠肿瘤ESD发生完整切除的单因素分析(例)
表4 结直肠肿瘤患者完整切除的多因素Logistic分析
[1]
乐晨琴,周欣毅,杨琦,等. 合并结直肠恶性肿瘤的多原发恶性肿瘤临床流行病学特点及病理特征分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志,2022, 44(08): 888-892.
[2]
王锡山. 从中美结直肠癌流行病学特征看结直肠癌早诊早治的重要性[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2021, 10(01):26-33.
[3]
Oh HH, Kim JS, Lim JW, et al. Clinical outcomes of colorectal neoplasm with positive resection margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 12353.
[4]
Uozumi T, Abe S, Mizuguchi Y, et al. Endoscopic hand suturing using a modified through-the-scope needle holder for mucosal closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection:Prospective multicenter study (with video) [J]. Dig Endosc, 2024,36(11): 1245-1252.
[5]
Takahashi K. Iwama T, Tanaka K, et al. Risk Factors for Post-Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Bleeding and Efficacy of Carbazochrome Sodium Sulfonate: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study [J]. Digestion, 2024, 22: 1-10.
[6]
史济华,李文彬,张晓宇,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗≥20mm结直肠肿瘤的临床结局分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(12): 991-996.
[7]
Albouys J, Manzah I, Schaefer M, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of the muscle retracting sign during endoscopic submucosal dissection of large macronodular colorectal lesions (with videos) [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2024, 99(3): 398-407.
[8]
袁庆港,刘理想,张亮,等. 尿素-肌酐比值(UCR)可预测结直肠癌患者术后的长期预后[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2024, 18(05): 506-509.
[9]
黄培,马怡晖,王琪,等. 结直肠肿瘤隆起型内镜黏膜下剥离术标本HE石蜡制片分析[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志,2023,39(10): 1268-1270.
[10]
Zhang Y, Gu F, Liu X, et al. A novel nomogram for the prediction of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2024, 30(4): 228-235 .
[11]
陈波,彭超,谭小辉,等. ESD治疗十二指肠非壶腹部侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性和有效性研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022, 16(02): 222-225.
[12]
罗玉梅,任牡丹,卢桂芳,等. 结直肠肿瘤性病变内镜黏膜下剥离术后息肉样瘢痕结节的临床分析[J]. 山东医药,2023,63(35): 82-84.
[13]
谷丰,姜维,刘宇航,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤不完整切除和手术时间延长的风险因素[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2022, 43(06): 959-965.
[14]
翁烃,姚高妍. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗≥40mm隆起型结直肠肿瘤的疗效评价[J]. 浙江临床医学,2022, 24(12): 1804-1806.
[15]
Oh HH, Jung YW, Jin BC, et al. Predictive factors associated with technical difficulty in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease(HASID) multicenter study [J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2024, 103(17): e37936.
[16]
Fang Z, Xu Y, Huang X. Impact of prophylactic wound closure in colorectal ESD on postoperative wound complications: A metaanalysis [J]. Int Wound J, 2024, 21(3): e14783.
[17]
史济华,李文彬,张晓宇,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗≥20 mm结直肠肿瘤的临床结局分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(12): 991-996.
[18]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition) [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2021,24(1): 1-21.
[19]
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline-Update 2024[J].Endoscopy, 2024, 56(7): 516-545.
[1] 王舒钰, 杨仕武, 陈君如, 巢凯, 马永钰, 刀娅, 洪伟, 高云鹏, 代如涛, 柏亚明, 曹辛, 吴骏. 胸腔镜手术治疗新生儿先天性膈疝疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(06): 603-610.
[2] 郝金锦, 王欢欢, 郑少祥, 陈文亮. 脂联素在结直肠癌中的作用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 61-65.
[3] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[4] 杜升兰, 张刘平, 肖燕玲. 三种手术策略在结直肠癌并肠梗阻中的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 294-297.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 姚焕章, 宋华传, 王永帅, 张珅瑜, 王继洲. 同期手术治疗同时性结直肠癌肝转移的安全性与疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 238-244.
[7] 袁佳莹, 范小彧, 费博, 喻春钊. 结直肠癌肝转移研究模型的现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 40-46.
[8] 陈颖, 王一, 王璐, 孔德松, 章阳, 樊志敏. 结直肠癌类器官在中药及其有效成分研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 47-52.
[9] 沈成龙, 刘海晨, 周放, 郭健, 石志良, 侍新宇, 周国强, 何宋兵. 内脏脂肪面积及肌肉减少症对结直肠癌患者手术疗效及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 83-90.
[10] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[11] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[12] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[13] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[14] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[15] 刘震宇, 高飞, 张文刚, 李海洋, 冯建聪, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 一种有效的食管ESD 术后狭窄动物模型的构建方法[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 35-40.
阅读次数
全文


摘要