切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 82 -85. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.01.022

论著

腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析
陈旭渊(), 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅   
  1. 610000 四川成都,西南医科大学附属成都三六三医院胃肠胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-02-26
  • 通信作者: 陈旭渊

Analysis of risk factors for wound healing difficulties after operative treatment of adenogenic anal fistula

Xuyuan Chen(), Shiyun Luo, Wenzhong Li, Yi Li   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal and Thoracic Surgery, The Affilliated Chengdu 363 Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Chengdu Sichuan Province 610000, China
  • Received:2023-09-13 Published:2024-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Xuyuan Chen
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Medical Research Project(S20068)
引用本文:

陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.

Xuyuan Chen, Shiyun Luo, Wenzhong Li, Yi Li. Analysis of risk factors for wound healing difficulties after operative treatment of adenogenic anal fistula[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.

目的

探讨腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年3月期间收治114例腺源性肛瘘患者资料。均行手术治疗,依据术后创面愈合情况将患者分为愈合良好组(n=93)及愈合困难组(n=21)。使用SPSS 22.0统计学软件进行分析,计量资料以()表示,采用独立样本t检验;计数资料以 [例(%)]呈现,采用χ2检验;通过单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的影响因素。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

对所有患者进行随访4周,创面愈合困难有21例(18.4%),创面愈合良好有93例(81.6%);年龄>60岁、有糖尿病史、合并便秘、合并术后创面细菌感染、术后抗生素使用种类>2种、创面存在引流不畅均为影响腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合的相关危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的发生风险较大,其危险因素较多,临床应针对危险因素采取针对性干预措施,以提升预后效果。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of wound healing difficulties after surgical treatment of adenogenic anal fistula.

Methods

Data of 114 patients with adenogenic anal fistula admitted from January 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgical treatment. According to postoperative wound healing, the patients were divided into good healing group (n=93) and difficult healing group (n=21). SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for analysis. Measurement data were represented by () and independent sample t test was used. Counting data were presented as [n (%)] and χ2 test was adopted. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of wound healing difficulties after surgical treatment of adenogenic anal fistula. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All patients were followed up for 4 weeks, 21 cases (18.4%) had difficulty in wound healing and 93 cases (81.6%) had good wound healing. Age >60 years old, history of diabetes, constipation, bacterial infection of postoperative wound, antibiotic use >2 kinds, and poor drainage of wound were all risk factors affecting wound healing after surgery for adenogenic anal fistula (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The risk of wound healing difficulties after surgical treatment of adenogenic anal fistula is greater, and there are many risk factors. Clinical intervention measures should be taken according to the risk factors to improve the prognosis.

表1 114例腺源性肛瘘患者经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的单因素分析[例(%)]
表2 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Amato A,Bottini C,De Nardi P,et al.Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula:SICCR position statement[J].Tech Coloproctol, 2020, 24(2): 127–143.
[2]
Schwandner O.Stem cell injection for complex anal fistula in Crohn's disease:A single-center experience[J].World J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(24): 3643–3653.
[3]
Steele SRKumar RFeingold D,et al. Practice Parametersfor the Management of Perianal Abscess and Fistula-in-Ano[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(12): 1465–1474.
[4]
马志琼,黄小瑜,何娇.肛周脓肿或肛瘘术后影响创面愈合质量的危险因素分析[J].临床误诊误治, 2020, 33(02): 76–80.
[5]
杨铁军,张婷,吕文佳.肛瘘精准微创术与传统肛瘘切开挂线引流术治疗肛瘘的近远期疗效比较[J].中国医药, 2020, 15(05): 753–757.
[6]
余伟儇,张传钊,王力斌,等. 结直肠癌合并糖尿病患者术后感染对机体Th17相关因子、sICAM-1、MMP-12表达的影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 468–471.
[7]
苏悦,张玉茹,赵团结.肛瘘栓填塞治疗经括约肌型肛瘘的长期愈合率及肛瘘愈合的影响因素[J].临床和实验医学杂志, 2021, 20(23): 2548–2551.
[8]
陶禹,韩加刚,王振军,等.肛瘘栓填塞治疗经括约肌型肛瘘的长期疗效及预后影响因素分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2020, 23(01): 71–75.
[9]
林丽晴,邹贤军,周凯亮,等.腺源性肛瘘术后创面愈合不良的危险因素分析及防治建议[J].川北医学院学报, 2020, 35(06): 1074–1077.
[10]
李建国,吴祥林,吴金霞,等.肛周脓肿或肛瘘术后难愈性创面患者多重耐药菌感染特征及危险因素分析[J].系统医学, 2022, 7(20): 115–118.
[11]
黎鑫振,叶锡,高方颖.高位肛瘘患者切开挂线引流术后创面愈合不良的相关因素Logistic回归分析[J].基层医学论坛, 2023, 27(08): 32–34.
[12]
张鸿光.肛瘘及肛周脓肿患者经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的影响因素分析[J].中国乡村医药, 2021, 28(08): 9–11.
[13]
刘军艳,张胜茹.中西医结合护理在肛瘘术后疼痛程度及便秘预防中的应用效果[J].湖南中医药大学学报, 2019, 39(09): 1157–1161.
[14]
张新红.影响肛瘘术后创面愈合质量的危险因素分析[J].中国肛肠病杂志, 2022, 42(11): 33–35.
[15]
张洋,郑刚,惠小苏.复方黄柏液坐浴辅助内口封闭联合负压封闭引流技术治疗高位肛周脓肿的疗效[J].西北药学杂志, 2023, 38(01): 168–172.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[4] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[5] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 王大伟, 陆雅斐, 皇甫少华, 陈玉婷, 陈澳, 江滨. 间充质干细胞通过调控免疫机制促进创面愈合的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 361-366.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?