切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 187 -191. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.02.019

论著

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胆总管下段癌围手术期安全性及疗效分析
潘冬花1, 李贵全1, 巫毓挺1, 刘贤1, 骆建美1, 何姗姗1, 付金强2,()   
  1. 1. 611530 四川邛崃,四川省人民医院?邛崃医院(邛崃市医疗中心医院)普外科
    2. 614000 四川乐山,乐山市人民医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-20 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 付金强

Perioperative safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the lower common bile duct

Donghua Pan1, Guiquan Li1, Yuting Wu1, Xian Liu1, Jianmei Luo1, Shanshan He1, Jinqiang Fu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery, Qionglai Medical Center Hospital, Qionglai Sichuan Province 611530, China
    2. Department of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, Leshan people’s Hospital, Leshan Sichuan Province 614000, China
  • Received:2021-02-20 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Jinqiang Fu
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Province 2019 First batch of Science and Technology Projects(19KPPX0226); Sichuan Health Research Project 2018(18ZD045)
引用本文:

潘冬花, 李贵全, 巫毓挺, 刘贤, 骆建美, 何姗姗, 付金强. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗胆总管下段癌围手术期安全性及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 187-191.

Donghua Pan, Guiquan Li, Yuting Wu, Xian Liu, Jianmei Luo, Shanshan He, Jinqiang Fu. Perioperative safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the lower common bile duct[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 187-191.

目的

研究腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)治疗胆总管下段癌围手术期安全性及其疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月97例行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)治疗胆总管下段癌患者的临床资料。其中,56例行腹腔镜辅助胰十二指肠切除术(LAPD)患者纳入LAPD组,41例行LPD患者纳入LPD组。使用SPSS 24.0统计学软件分析数据,围手术期指标等计量资料以(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析。以P<0.05为检验标准。

结果

LAPD组手术时间及消化道重建时间较LPD组更短,而术中出血量较LPD组更多,且患者术后排气时间较LPD组更长,两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者住院时间、淋巴结清扫数目和术后并发症两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者均成功随访,随访时间12~59个月,中位随访时间26个月。两组患者术后1年总生存率(OS)分别为87.3%、87.6%,3年OS分别为46.6%、41.2%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

LPD治疗胆总管下段癌安全可行,相较于LAPD有着创伤更小、术后恢复更快等优势,但其操作难度大,术者应在严格培训学习后实践,以保证手术安全性及有效性。

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)in the treatment of the lower common bile duct carcinoma.

Methods

Data of 97 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)for lower common bile duct carcinoma from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them,56 patients undergoing laparoscopic assist pancreaticoduodenectomy were included in the LAPD group,and 41 patients undergoing LPD were included in the LPD group. Data were analyzed by SPSS 24.0 statistical software. Perioperative indexes and other measurement data were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and independent sample t test was performed. Postoperative complications were tested by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used for survival analysis. P<0.05 was taken as the test standard.

Results

Compared with the LPD group,the operation time and digestive tract reconstruction time of the LAPD group were shorter,while the intraoperative blood loss was more than that of the LPD group,and the postoperative exhaust time was longer,with statistical significance between the two groups(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay,number of lymph nodes dissected and postoperative complications between two groups(P>0.05).All patients were successfully followed up for 12~59 months,with a median follow-up time of 26 months. The 1-year overall survival rate(OS)was 87.3% and 87.6%,and the 3 years OS was 46.6% and 41.2%,respectively,with no statistical significance between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

LPD is safe and feasible in the treatment of carcinoma of the lower common bile duct. Compared with LAPD,LPD has the advantages of less trauma and faster postoperative recovery. However,it is difficult to operate,and the operators should practice it after strict training and learning to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the operation.

表1 97例胆总管下段癌不同术式两组患者一般临床资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 97例胆总管下段癌不同术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 97例胆总管下段癌不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率比较(例)
图1 97例胆总管下段癌不同术式两组患者术后总生存曲线分析
[1]
中国抗癌协会. 远端胆管癌规范化诊治专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志201824(1):1-8.
[2]
De Rooij T,,Lu MZ,,Steen MW,et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy:Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Cohort and Registry Studies[J]. Ann Surg2016264(2):257-267.
[3]
Beetz O,,Klein M,,Schrem H,et al. Relevant prognostic factors influencing outcome of patients after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. BMC Surg201818(1):56.
[4]
周叶明,陆才德,朱宏达,等. 胆总管下段癌行根治性胰十二指肠切除术23例临床分析[J]. 现代实用医学201931(8):1073-1075.
[5]
李方平,熊彬,龚建平. 胰十二指肠切除术后主要并发症的诊断与治疗进展[J]. 国际外科学杂志201845(5):341-344.
[6]
耿炜,彭金茹,赵雪琪,等. 加速康复外科模式对腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术后患者肠道黏膜屏障影响的研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(3):260-263.
[7]
Palanivelu C,,Senthilnathan P,,Sabnis SC,et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours[J]. Br J Surg2017104(11):1443-1450.
[8]
Kang CM,,Lee WJ. Is Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasible for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?[J]. Cancers202012(11):3430.
[9]
Wang M,,Peng B,,Liu J,et al. Practice Patterns and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in China:A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of 1029 Patients[J]. Ann Surg2021273(1):145-153.
[10]
姜宁,王宏. 改良胰肠吻合方式对胰十二指肠切除术后患者胰瘘的影响及影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(3):262-265.
[11]
尹杰,陆子鹏,张凯,等. 492例胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟的预后因素分析[J]. 中华外科杂志201856(1):35-40.
[12]
Komaya K,,Ebata T,,Shirai K,et al. Recurrence after resection with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg2017104(4):426-433.
[13]
洪德飞. 腹腔镜与达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠切除术进展[J]. 浙江医学201840(19):2093-2096.
[14]
Nassour I,,Wang SC,,Christie A,et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy:A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients[J]. Ann Surg2018268(1):151-157.
[15]
胡仁健,秦红军,程刚,等. 腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术36例[J]. 武警医学201930(8):709-711.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?