切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 207 -210. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.024

所属专题: 文献

论著

甲状腺系膜切除术在中央区淋巴结清扫的临床研究
李全1,(), 张景华1, 宋冀涛1, 杨小华1   
  1. 1. 062552 河北任丘,华油总医院二部医院 普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-05 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 李全

Clinical study of total mesangyroidectomy in central lymph node dissection

Quan Li1,(), Jinghua Zhang1, Jitao Song1, Xiaohua Yang1   

  1. 1. General Surgery, 2nd Hospital, Huayou General Hospita, Renqiu Hebei, 062552
  • Received:2020-06-05 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Quan Li
  • Supported by:
    Hebei Province Natural Science Foundation Research Program(2018JM7067); Study on the Application of New Medical and Health Clinical Technology in Huabei Oilfield Mining Area(2019-HB-G0203)
引用本文:

李全, 张景华, 宋冀涛, 杨小华. 甲状腺系膜切除术在中央区淋巴结清扫的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 207-210.

Quan Li, Jinghua Zhang, Jitao Song, Xiaohua Yang. Clinical study of total mesangyroidectomy in central lymph node dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 207-210.

目的

探讨甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者行甲状腺系膜切除术的中央区淋巴结清扫的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2017年10月至2019年4月173例PTC患者临床资料。根据术式不同分为两组,常规组98例,术中行常规中央区淋巴结清扫;系膜组75例,术中行甲状腺系膜切除术清扫中央区淋巴结。使用统计软件SPSS 24.0分析,围术期指标、甲状旁腺素(PTH)、血钙等计量资料采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;术后并发症、复发转移率等计数资料采用χ2检验。以P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及中央区淋巴结清扫数目中差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术后3 d PTH及血钙水平均较术前明显下降,且常规组较系膜组均更低(P<0.05);常规组术后并发症发生率为20.4%明显高于系膜组9.3%(P<0.05);术后平均随访12.7个月,术后3个月内,所有患者PTH均恢复正常,无永久性喉返神经损伤及永久性甲状旁腺功能低下发生。随访期内常规组复发转移率为5.1%,系膜组为2.7%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在PTC手术中,通过甲状腺系膜切除术清扫中央区淋巴结,具有手术并发症发生率低,更好地保护甲状旁腺功能,避免血钙水平过度下降的优势。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of central lymph node dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) undergoing mesyroidectomy.

Method

The clinical data of 173 PTC patients from October 2017 to April 2019 were collected. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into 2 groups, the conventional group(n=98) underwent routine central lymph node dissection, 75 patients underwent mesangyroidectomy to dissect central lymph nodes . SPSS 24.0 software was used for data analysis of perioperative indicators, PTH, blood calcium and other measurement data were represented by (±s). Independent sample t test. The counting data of postoperative complications, recurrence and metastasis rate were measured by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and the number of central lymph node dissection (P>0.05). The mean postoperative follow-up was 12.7 months, and PTH and of all patients returned to normal within 3 months after the operation, without permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury or permanent hypoparathyroidism. During the follow-up period, the recurrence and metastasis rate of the conventional group was 5.1%, and that of the mesangial group was 2.7%, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusion

In the PTC surgery, central lymph node dissection through thyroid mesangial resection has the advantage of low incidence of surgical complications, better protection of parathyroid function, and avoiding excessive decrease of blood calcium level.

表1 173例PTC患者不同术式两组患者一般临床资料[(±s),例]
图1 甲状腺系膜切除术中央区淋巴结清扫
表2 173例PTC患者不同术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s)
表3 173例PTC患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率比较(例)
表4 173例PTC患者不同术式两组患者术前术后PTH及血钙水平比较(±s)
[1]
郑向前,候秀坤,高明.2017年第二版NCCN甲状腺肿瘤指南解读[J].中国肿瘤临床,2018,45(1):14-17.
[2]
Sun W, Lan XB, Wang ZH, et al.MicroRNA-144 inhibits proliferation by targeting WW domain-containing transcription regulator protein 1 in papillary thyroid cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15(1): 1007-1013.
[3]
中国医师协会外科医师分会甲状腺外科医师委员会.甲状腺手术中甲状旁腺保护专家共识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(7):731-736.
[4]
潘先均,胡代星,苏新良.颈部中央区淋巴结清扫及术中冰冻病理检查在甲状腺微小乳头状癌治疗中的临床价值[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2018,38(2):180-183.
[5]
席树强,李茂恒.中央区淋巴结清除在甲状腺乳头状癌手术中的应用价值[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(8):654-656.
[6]
Miccoli P, Bakkar S. Surgical management of papillary thyroid carcinoma: an overview[J]. Updates Surg, 2017, 69(2): 145-150.
[7]
McGuire S. World Cancer Report 2014.Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO ress, 2015[J]. Adv Nutr, 2016, 7(2): 418-419.
[8]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等.2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志,2019,5(1):87-97.
[9]
Yu Y, Yu XH, Fan CL, et al.Targeting glutaminase-mediated glutamine dependence in papillary thyroid cancer[J]. J Mol Med, 2018, 96(8): 777-790.
[10]
唐志强,单远洲.甲状腺腺叶+峡部+对侧次全切除术与甲状腺全切术+中央区淋巴结清扫治疗颈淋巴结阴性甲状腺乳头状癌的疗效观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2018,15(3):37-40.
[11]
中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会外科学分会内分泌学组,中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会,等.甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南[J].中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(2):96-115.
[12]
中国抗癌协会甲状腺癌专业委员会(CATO).甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016版) [J].中国肿瘤临床,2016,43(10):405-411.
[13]
Zhou HY, He JC, McHenry CR.Inadvertent parathyroidectomy: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes [J]. J Surg Res, 2016, 205(1): 70-75.
[14]
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The Amercan Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
[15]
雷尚通.甲状腺系膜切除术--基于解剖层面的手术技术[J].临床外科杂志,2017,25(11):823-825.
[16]
Ryoo I, Kim DW, Lee CY, et al.Analysis of postoperative ultrasonography surveillance after total thyroidectomy in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a multicenter study[J]. Acta Radiol, 2018, 59(2): 196-203.
[17]
Park HK, Kim DW, Ha TK, et al.Utility of routine ultrasonography follow-up after total thyroidectomy in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a single-center study[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2018, 18(1): 12.
[18]
Vasileiadis I, Boutzios G, Karalaki M, et al.Papillary thyroid carcinoma of the isthmus: Total thyroidectomy or isthmusectomy?[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 216(1): 135-139.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 张卫平, 王婧玲, 刘志兴, 陈莉, 谌芳群. 肾透明细胞癌高帧频超声造影时间-强度曲线特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 916-922.
[3] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[4] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[5] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[8] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[9] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[10] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[11] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[12] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[13] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[14] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[15] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
阅读次数
全文


摘要