切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 361 -365. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

Galon免疫评分联合围手术期NRS对结直肠癌患者术后预后的预测价值研究
郭飞1, 薛军1,(), 韩磊1, 张晓阳1, 吕燕琴1, 李明晖1   
  1. 1. 075000 河北张家口,河北北方学院附属第一医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-14 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 薛军

Study on the predictive value of perioperative NRS score and Galon immune score for postoperative prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer

Fei Guo1, Jun Xue1,(), Lei Han1, Xiaoyang Zhang1, Yanqin Lyu1, Minghui Li1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the first affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Hebei 075000, China
  • Received:2020-01-14 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Jun Xue
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xue Jun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hebei Province(20180863)
引用本文:

郭飞, 薛军, 韩磊, 张晓阳, 吕燕琴, 李明晖. Galon免疫评分联合围手术期NRS对结直肠癌患者术后预后的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 361-365.

Fei Guo, Jun Xue, Lei Han, Xiaoyang Zhang, Yanqin Lyu, Minghui Li. Study on the predictive value of perioperative NRS score and Galon immune score for postoperative prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 361-365.

目的

探究Galon免疫评分联合围术期营养风险筛查量表(NRS 2002)对结直肠癌患者术后预后的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年10月至2016年10月接受结直肠癌根治术的97例原发性结直肠癌患者资料。采用统计软件SPSS 21.0进行数据分析,利用Kplan-Meier法及Cox回归模型分析围手术期NRS评分及原发灶Galon免疫评分与结直肠癌患者术后预后的关系及与临床病理特征间的相关性。采用ROC曲线检验联合评分预测模型对结直肠癌患者术后总生存的预测价值,并行Kplan-Meier分析预后,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

97例入组患者术后1、2、3年累计总生存率分别为95.9%、89.7%、70.1%。围术期NRS评分0分组患者3年总生存率>1分组>2分组(Logrank χ2=19.337,P=0.000)。原发灶Galon免疫评分0分组患者3年总生存率<1分组<2分组<3分组<4分组(Logrank χ2=30.511, P=0.000)。围术期NRS评分联合Galon免疫评分预测结直肠癌术后预后的诊断价值高于单个评分,其AUC值为0.785,灵敏度为65.93%,特异度为84.12%,约登指数为0.501。低危组患者术后3年总生存率优于高危组(Logrank χ2=12.517, P=0.000)。

结论

围手术期营养评分联合肿瘤免疫评分对结直肠癌患者预后具有较高预测价值,可在临床中推广应用。

Objective

To explore the predictive value of perioperative NRS score and Galon immune score for postoperative prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Retrospective analysis were performed in 97 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection from October 2014 to October 2016. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 21.0 software. Kplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to analyze the correlation between perioperative NRS score, primary lesion Galon immune score, postoperative prognosis of patients and clinicopathological features. ROC curves were used to test the predictive value of the combined score prediction model for total postoperative survival of patients with colorectal cancer, and Kplan-Meier was used to analyze the prognosis, A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates of 97 enrolled patients were 95.9%, 89.7% and 70.1%, respectively. Compared with perioperative NRS score 1 and 2, Patients with NRS score 0 had a better 3-year overall survival rate (log-rank χ2=19.337, P=0.000). In terms of primary lesion Galon immune score, patients score 0/1/2/3/4 appeared to have a gradually poor 3-year overall survival rate (log-rank χ2=30.511, P=0.000). The value of perioperative NRS score combined with Galon immune score in predicting postoperative prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer was higher than that of a single score, with an AUC value of 0.785, a sensitivity of 65.93%, a specificity of 84.12%, and a yoden index of 0.501. The 3-year overall survival rate of the low-risk group was better than that of the high-risk group (log-rank χ2=12.517, P=0.000).

Conclusion

Perioperative nutrition score combined with tumor immune score has a high predictive value for prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer, which could be applied in clinical practice.

表1 97例原发性结直肠癌患者一般基线资料
图1 Galon免疫评分方法[6][A:CT-红色区域,IM-棕色区域;B:CD3、CD8阳性细胞在CT 、IM区域的分布;C和D:免疫评分模式]
图2 97例原发性结直肠癌患者围术期NRS评分与Galon免疫评分[A:围术期NRS评分;B:Galon免疫评分]
表2 97例原发性结直肠癌患者NRS评分及Galon免疫评分与临床病理特征的关系
表3 97例原发性结直肠癌患者术后总生存Cox回归多因素分析
图3 围术期NRS评分联合Galon免疫评分预测97例结直肠癌患者预后的ROC曲线图
图4 Kplan-Meier法分析97例结直肠癌患者高危组和低危组术后总生存率
[1]
姚宏伟,张忠涛.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1): 1-4.
[2]
郑民华,何子锐.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的热点与未来发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(5): 433-436.
[3]
孙成,田志刚.免疫评分:依据肿瘤组织免疫特性进行预后预测[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2015,22(2): 177-182.
[4]
朱丽,陈镇燕.胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者术前营养不良相关因素研究[J].中国医刊,2018,53(9): 996-1000.
[5]
Jensen BT, Dalbagni G, Borre M,et al. Preoperative Nutritional Status and The Impact on Radical Cystectomy Recovery:An International Comparative Study[J].Urol Nurs, 2016, 36(3): 133-140,152.
[6]
Galon J, Mlecnik B, Marliot F, et al.Validation of the immunoscore (IM) as a prognostic marker in stage I/II/III colon cancer: results of a worldwide consortium-based analysis of 1,336 patients[J]. C?lon & Rectum,2016,10(3): 197-199.
[7]
凌浩,董长女,傅启全.结直肠癌肺转移患者的临床特征及预后生存分析[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2017,24(6): 718-721.
[8]
张景淳,郑桐森,张艳桥.免疫评分在结直肠癌中的研究进展[J].中国肿瘤,2017,26(8): 612-616.
[9]
刘婷婷,张骜,胡芳. POSSUM、P-POSSUM和Cr-POSSUM及E-PASS评分系统对结直肠癌患者术后死亡风险的预测价值[J]. 中国全科医学,2017, 20(27): 3368-3371.
[10]
陈娟,杜成,丁震宇,等.恶性肿瘤患者营养状况及相关影响因素分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2018,26(1): 91-94.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会营养支持学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师委员会.结直肠癌围手术期营养治疗中国专家共识(2019版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2019,39(6): 533-537.
[12]
刘剑超,史汝峰,张海燕.术前营养干预对NRS2002评分≥3分胃癌患者术后的影响分析[J].中国实用医药,2019,14(20): 162-163.
[13]
陈晓秋,李柱,胡阳春,等.消化道恶性肿瘤患者营养风险、营养状况与炎症因子的相关性及其对临床结局的影响[J].广东医学,2015,36(10): 1505-1508.
[14]
张利飞,裴海平.结直肠癌预后预测研究进展[J].中国普通外科杂志,2015,24(4): 581-588.
[15]
Wang YY, Bai ZL, He JL, et al. Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-Related Factors in Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Cisplatin-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy[J]. Dis Markers, 2016, 2016(12): 1-9.
[16]
Liang Y, Xiao W, Guan YX, et al. Prognostic value of the C-reactive protein/Albumin Ratio (CAR) in patients with operable soft tissue sarcoma[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(58): 98135-98147.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[6] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[7] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[8] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[9] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要