切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 241 -243. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

二种手术方法治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12水平比较
夏会敏1,(), 张丽萍1, 田婷1, 孙武2   
  1. 1. 518109 深圳市龙华区人民医院普外科
    2. 528403 广东中山,中山人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-31 出版日期:2019-06-26
  • 通信作者: 夏会敏

Comparison of efficacy of two surgical procedures in treatment of primary liver cancer and changes of chemokine 12 levels

Huimin Xia1,(), Liping Zhang1, Ting Tian1, Wu Sun2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People’s Hospital in Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518109, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan Guangdong, 528403, China
  • Received:2018-07-31 Published:2019-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Huimin Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Huimin, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Medical research fund project in Guangdong province(B2015439)
引用本文:

夏会敏, 张丽萍, 田婷, 孙武. 二种手术方法治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12水平比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 241-243.

Huimin Xia, Liping Zhang, Ting Tian, Wu Sun. Comparison of efficacy of two surgical procedures in treatment of primary liver cancer and changes of chemokine 12 levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 241-243.

目的

研究完全腹腔镜根治术与开腹术治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12动态变化。

方法

回顾性分析2015年5月至2017年10月期间接受诊治的92例原发性肝癌患者临床资料,根据患者手术方式不同分成开腹组43例(开腹手术)、腹腔镜组49例(完全腹腔镜根治术)。采用SPSS20.0统计学软件,术后恢复情况、手术前后趋化因子12动态变化计量资料采用±s表示,独立t检验;术后并发症发生率采用χ2检验;以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率、术后引流管留置时间、术后首次进食时间、术后住院时间均低于开腹组(P<0.05);随着术后恢复时间增加,两组趋化因子12的表达水平逐渐降低(P<0.05),腹腔镜组术后1 d、3 d、7 d趋化因子12水平均低于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后7 d趋化因子12降至正常水平。

结论

完全腹腔镜根治术治疗原发性肝癌疗效确切,术后并发症发生率低,术后恢复快,能减轻机体炎症反应。

Objective

To study the efficacy of total laparoscopic radical surgery and open surgery in treatment of primary liver cancer and its influence on dynamic changes of chemokine 12.

Methods

The clinical data of 92 patients with primary liver cancer in our hospital from May 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into 43 cases of open group (open surgery) and 49 cases of laparoscopic group (total laparoscopic radical surgery) by surgical procedures. SPSS20.0 statistical software was adopted, the measurement data of postoperative recovery, dynamic changes of chemokine 12 before and after surgery were expressed by (±s), and independent t test was adopted; The incidence of postoperative complications was measured by χ2 test; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative first feeding time, postoperative hospital stays in laparoscopic group were lower than those in open group (P<0.05); The chemokine 12 expression levels in two groups gradually decreased as postoperative recovery time increased (P<0.05), and the postoperative 1 d, 3 d, 7 d chemokine 12 levels in laparoscopic group were lower than those in open group (P<0.05); There was no statistical difference in the postoperative 7 d chemokine 12 level between laparoscopic group and healthy group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Total laparoscopic radical surgery in treatment of primary liver cancer is effective, it can achieve low incidence of postoperative complications and quicj postoperative recovery, and the chemokine 12 level quickly decreases.

表1 92例原发性肝癌患者不同手术方法两组术后恢复情况对比(±s, d)
表2 92例原发性肝癌患者不同手术方法两组趋化因子12水平比较(±s, ng/ml)
[1]
沈锋.提高原发性肝癌外科疗效的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2015,37(9):643-646.
[2]
Di Fabio F, Barkhatov L, Bonadio I, et al.The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(6): 1046-1054.
[3]
刘志发,王继才,苏志雷,等.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝癌的短期临床疗效比较[J].医学综述,2018,24(9):1847-1851.
[4]
李敬东,李强.腹腔镜肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2017,30(4):243-246,260.
[5]
丁振昊,蒋力,张珂,等.腹腔镜与开放式肝癌切除术治疗原发性肝癌患者临床效果对比分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(13):1113-1116.
[6]
Wang XT, Wang HG, Duan WD, et al.Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Primary Liver Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Case-Matched Study[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(43): e1854.
[7]
柴松山,王健,项帅,等.单中心腹腔镜下肝癌肝切除术457例分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(5):376-379.
[8]
罗庆丰.趋化因子12与肿瘤[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(5):789-790.
[9]
Hsieh CY, Tsai HW, Chang CC, et al.Tumors Involving Skin, Soft Tissue and Skeletal Muscle: Benign, Primary Malignant or Metastatic?[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 16(15): 6681-6684.
[10]
孙启峰,赵志强,张启文,等.腹腔镜肝部分切除术治疗肝癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的变化[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2018, 21(1):121-122.
[11]
欧阳正晟,唐朝晖,吕丽娟,等.腹腔镜肝切除与开腹肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的临床比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(1):126-130.
[12]
Luo X, Wang X, Xia Z, et al.CXCL12/CXCR4 axis: an emerging neuromodulator in pathological pain[J]. Rev Neurosci, 2016, 27(1): 83-92.
[13]
杨俊波,黄晓洁.白细胞介素-24通过CXC趋化因子配体12/CXC趋化因子受体4信号轴抑制肿瘤细胞转移[J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(10):2465-2468.
[14]
Maarschalk J, Robinson SM, White SA.Port site metastases following laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2015, 97(4): e52-53.
[15]
张华,陈旭义,杨波,等.肝细胞肝癌患者血清micro RNA-224水平变化及其临床诊断意义的研究V.中国肿瘤临床,2014,41(9):576-579.
[16]
Ozawa PMM, Ariza CB, Ishibashi CM, et al.Role of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in normal cerebellar development and medulloblastoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 138(1): 10-3.
[1] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[2] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[3] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[4] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[5] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[6] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[7] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[8] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[9] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[10] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[11] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[12] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[13] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[14] 陈安, 冯娟, 杨振宇, 杜锡林, 柏强善, 阴继凯, 臧莉, 鲁建国. 基于生物信息学分析CCN4在肝细胞癌中表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 702-707.
[15] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
阅读次数
全文


摘要