切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 241 -243. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

二种手术方法治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12水平比较
夏会敏1,(), 张丽萍1, 田婷1, 孙武2   
  1. 1. 518109 深圳市龙华区人民医院普外科
    2. 528403 广东中山,中山人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-31 出版日期:2019-06-26
  • 通信作者: 夏会敏

Comparison of efficacy of two surgical procedures in treatment of primary liver cancer and changes of chemokine 12 levels

Huimin Xia1,(), Liping Zhang1, Ting Tian1, Wu Sun2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, People’s Hospital in Longhua District of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518109, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan Guangdong, 528403, China
  • Received:2018-07-31 Published:2019-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Huimin Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Huimin, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Medical research fund project in Guangdong province(B2015439)
引用本文:

夏会敏, 张丽萍, 田婷, 孙武. 二种手术方法治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12水平比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 241-243.

Huimin Xia, Liping Zhang, Ting Tian, Wu Sun. Comparison of efficacy of two surgical procedures in treatment of primary liver cancer and changes of chemokine 12 levels[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(03): 241-243.

目的

研究完全腹腔镜根治术与开腹术治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及趋化因子12动态变化。

方法

回顾性分析2015年5月至2017年10月期间接受诊治的92例原发性肝癌患者临床资料,根据患者手术方式不同分成开腹组43例(开腹手术)、腹腔镜组49例(完全腹腔镜根治术)。采用SPSS20.0统计学软件,术后恢复情况、手术前后趋化因子12动态变化计量资料采用±s表示,独立t检验;术后并发症发生率采用χ2检验;以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率、术后引流管留置时间、术后首次进食时间、术后住院时间均低于开腹组(P<0.05);随着术后恢复时间增加,两组趋化因子12的表达水平逐渐降低(P<0.05),腹腔镜组术后1 d、3 d、7 d趋化因子12水平均低于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后7 d趋化因子12降至正常水平。

结论

完全腹腔镜根治术治疗原发性肝癌疗效确切,术后并发症发生率低,术后恢复快,能减轻机体炎症反应。

Objective

To study the efficacy of total laparoscopic radical surgery and open surgery in treatment of primary liver cancer and its influence on dynamic changes of chemokine 12.

Methods

The clinical data of 92 patients with primary liver cancer in our hospital from May 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into 43 cases of open group (open surgery) and 49 cases of laparoscopic group (total laparoscopic radical surgery) by surgical procedures. SPSS20.0 statistical software was adopted, the measurement data of postoperative recovery, dynamic changes of chemokine 12 before and after surgery were expressed by (±s), and independent t test was adopted; The incidence of postoperative complications was measured by χ2 test; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative first feeding time, postoperative hospital stays in laparoscopic group were lower than those in open group (P<0.05); The chemokine 12 expression levels in two groups gradually decreased as postoperative recovery time increased (P<0.05), and the postoperative 1 d, 3 d, 7 d chemokine 12 levels in laparoscopic group were lower than those in open group (P<0.05); There was no statistical difference in the postoperative 7 d chemokine 12 level between laparoscopic group and healthy group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Total laparoscopic radical surgery in treatment of primary liver cancer is effective, it can achieve low incidence of postoperative complications and quicj postoperative recovery, and the chemokine 12 level quickly decreases.

表1 92例原发性肝癌患者不同手术方法两组术后恢复情况对比(±s, d)
表2 92例原发性肝癌患者不同手术方法两组趋化因子12水平比较(±s, ng/ml)
[1]
沈锋.提高原发性肝癌外科疗效的研究进展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2015,37(9):643-646.
[2]
Di Fabio F, Barkhatov L, Bonadio I, et al.The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(6): 1046-1054.
[3]
刘志发,王继才,苏志雷,等.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝癌的短期临床疗效比较[J].医学综述,2018,24(9):1847-1851.
[4]
李敬东,李强.腹腔镜肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2017,30(4):243-246,260.
[5]
丁振昊,蒋力,张珂,等.腹腔镜与开放式肝癌切除术治疗原发性肝癌患者临床效果对比分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(13):1113-1116.
[6]
Wang XT, Wang HG, Duan WD, et al.Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Primary Liver Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Case-Matched Study[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(43): e1854.
[7]
柴松山,王健,项帅,等.单中心腹腔镜下肝癌肝切除术457例分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(5):376-379.
[8]
罗庆丰.趋化因子12与肿瘤[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(5):789-790.
[9]
Hsieh CY, Tsai HW, Chang CC, et al.Tumors Involving Skin, Soft Tissue and Skeletal Muscle: Benign, Primary Malignant or Metastatic?[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 16(15): 6681-6684.
[10]
孙启峰,赵志强,张启文,等.腹腔镜肝部分切除术治疗肝癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的变化[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2018, 21(1):121-122.
[11]
欧阳正晟,唐朝晖,吕丽娟,等.腹腔镜肝切除与开腹肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的临床比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(1):126-130.
[12]
Luo X, Wang X, Xia Z, et al.CXCL12/CXCR4 axis: an emerging neuromodulator in pathological pain[J]. Rev Neurosci, 2016, 27(1): 83-92.
[13]
杨俊波,黄晓洁.白细胞介素-24通过CXC趋化因子配体12/CXC趋化因子受体4信号轴抑制肿瘤细胞转移[J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(10):2465-2468.
[14]
Maarschalk J, Robinson SM, White SA.Port site metastases following laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2015, 97(4): e52-53.
[15]
张华,陈旭义,杨波,等.肝细胞肝癌患者血清micro RNA-224水平变化及其临床诊断意义的研究V.中国肿瘤临床,2014,41(9):576-579.
[16]
Ozawa PMM, Ariza CB, Ishibashi CM, et al.Role of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in normal cerebellar development and medulloblastoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 138(1): 10-3.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[4] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[13] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要