切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 93 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.029

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下胰腺全系膜切除治疗胰头癌的临床疗效分析
王成正1, 谢芝海2,(), 覃立文2   
  1. 1. 226008 江苏南通,南通大学附属建湖人民医院肛肠科
    2. 537001 广西玉林市第三人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 谢芝海

Clinical effect of laparoscopic total mesopancreas excision in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma

Chengzheng Wang1, Zhihai Xie2,(), Liwen Qin2   

  1. 1. Department of proctology, Affiliated jianhu people’s hospital of Nantong university, Nantong 226008
    2. Department of general surgery, the third people’s Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Guangxi 537001
  • Received:2018-01-23 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhihai Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Zhihai, Email:
引用本文:

王成正, 谢芝海, 覃立文. 腹腔镜下胰腺全系膜切除治疗胰头癌的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 93-95.

Chengzheng Wang, Zhihai Xie, Liwen Qin. Clinical effect of laparoscopic total mesopancreas excision in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 93-95.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下胰腺全系膜切除治疗胰头癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年4月至2016年4月46例胰头癌患者资料,根据手术术式的差异分为腹腔镜组(25例)和开腹组(21例),腹腔镜组行腹腔镜下胰腺全系膜切除术,开腹组行开腹胰十二指肠切除术。采用SPSS 19.0统计学软件进行统计分析,术前和术后相关指标以均数±标准差表示,组间比较采用独立t检验;R0切除率、术后并发症发生率采用χ2检验,以P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组患者的R0切除率为88.0%,开腹组患者为61.9%(P<0.05);与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组患者的手术时间显著增加,而术中出血量及术中输血量均显著减少(P<0.05);与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组患者的术后肛门排气时间、进食流质食物时间及住院时间均显著缩短(P<0.05);腹腔镜组患者术后并发症的发生率16.0%,开腹组42.9%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下胰腺全系膜切除治疗胰头癌的临床疗效较好,且安全性较高,值得在临床上推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect and security of laparoscopic total mesopancreas excision in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma.

Methods

46 cases of pancreatic head carcinoma were collected from April 2013 to April 2016 in our hospital and conducted a retrospective analysis. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into laparoscope group (25 cases) and open surgery group (21cases), the laparoscope group was given laparoscopic total mesopancreas excision surgery, the open surgery group was given open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 19.0 software, preoperative and postoperative related indicators were presented as and examined by using t test; enumeration data (excision rate of R0, the incidence of the complications after operation) was examined by chi square test. A P<0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

The excision rate of R0 in laparoscope group was 88.0%, the excision rate of R0 in open surgery group was 61.9% (P<0.05). Compared with the open surgery group, the operation time of the laparoscope group was significantly increased, but the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative transfusion were significantly decreased (P<0.05); Compared with the open surgery group, the postoperative anal exhaust time, eat liquid food time and hospital stays of the laparoscope group were significantly shortened (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications of the laparoscope group was 16.0%, the incidence of postoperative complications of the open surgery group was 42.9%, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic total mesopancreas excision in the treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma has good clinical effect and security, it is worth promoting the application in clinic.

表1 46例胰头癌患者不同术式两组患者一般临床资料的比较(±s)
表2 46例胰头癌患者不同术式两组患者术中相关指标的比较(±s)
表3 46例胰头癌患者不同术式两组患者术后相关指标的比较(±s)
表4 46例胰头癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率的比较[例(%)]
[1]
Schietroma M, Pessia B, Carlei F, et al. Intestinal permeability changes, systemic endotoxemia, inflammatory serum markers and sepsis after Whipple's operation for carcinoma of the pancreas head[J].Pancreatology, 2017, 17(5): 839-846.
[2]
Park SY, Park KM, Shin WY, et al. Functional and morphological evolution of remnant pancreas after resection for pancreaticadenocarcinoma[J].Medicine, 2017, 96(28): e7495.
[3]
Gilabert M, Boher JM, Raoul JL, et al. Comparison of preoperative imaging and pathological findings for pancreatic headadenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis by the Association Fran?aise de Chirurgie[J].Medicine, 2017, 96(24): e7214.
[4]
Wu W, Wang X,Wu X, et al. Total mesopancreas excision for pancreatic head cancer: analysis of 120 cases[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2016, 28(4): 423-428.
[5]
Gilabert M, Chanez B, Rho YS, et al. Evaluation of gemcitabine efficacy after the FOLFIRINOX regimen in patients with advancedpancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(16): e6544.
[6]
Sakamoto Y, Fujikawa T, Tanaka A. Successful radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma in a patient with replaced right hepatic artery originating from posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery: a case report[J]. Surg Case Rep, 2017, 3(1): 78-78.
[7]
马春阳,朱峰,肖光勤,等. 植入式胰管空肠吻合术在全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016, 23(4): 388-392.
[8]
戴梦华.腹腔镜下半旋转胰头动脉优先入路胰十二指肠切除术的临床意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):275-278.
[9]
李汉华,王慧玲,区应亮,等. PET/CT及肿瘤病理特征与胰头癌手术预后的关系[J]. 广东医学,2015, 36(6): 896-898.
[10]
刘颖斌,吴文广.胰腺全系膜切除理念争议及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016, 36(8): 836-838.
[11]
庄岩,田孝东,高红桥,等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4):271-274.
[12]
Duconseil P, Périnel J, Autret A, et al. Resectable invasive IPMN versus sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head of thepancreas: Should these two different diseases receive the same treatment? A matched comparison study of the French Surgical Association (AFC)[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2017,43(9): 1704-1710.
[13]
黄鹤光,林荣贵.腹腔镜前入路静脉优先与右后入路动脉优先联合切除钩突的优势[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):279-282.
[14]
Terakawa H,Kitagawa H,Makino I,et al. Location of the meso-pancreatoduodenum as a regional lymphatic basin for pancreatic headcarcinoma[J]. Oncol Lett,2017,14(1): 397-403.
[15]
Zhou Y,Wang HJ. Occurrence pattern and impact of lymph node micrometastasisi pancreatic head cancer[J]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 2017, 39(9): 664-667.
[16]
张建生,王天阳,刘润田,等. 胰腺全系膜切除用于腹腔镜胰头癌根治术34例疗效分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(4): 447-451.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?