切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 25 -28. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

两种TME术式治疗超低位直肠癌临床疗效及安全性比较
王勇1,()   
  1. 1. 441400 湖北襄阳 ,宜城市人民医院普一科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-11 出版日期:2019-02-26
  • 通信作者: 王勇

Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open TME for ultra low rectal cancer

Yong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. The first Department of general surgery, Yicheng people’s Hospital, Hubei 441400, China
  • Received:2018-02-11 Published:2019-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Yong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Yong, Email:
引用本文:

王勇. 两种TME术式治疗超低位直肠癌临床疗效及安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 25-28.

Yong Wang. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open TME for ultra low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 25-28.

目的

研究腹腔镜与开腹两种全直肠系膜切除术(TME)治疗超低位直肠癌临床疗效及安全性。

方法

选择2013年1月至2015年12月接受治疗的超低位直肠癌患者110例。用随机数表法分为开腹组和腹腔镜组,每组各55例,采用SPSS21.0进行统计学分析,两组患者的术中术后指标和Wexner评分等用(±s)表示,组间比较用独立t检验;系膜完整率、并发症发生率和生存率等计数资料用率表示,用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者的远切端距离和淋巴结清扫数量相近(P>0.05),腹腔镜组患者的手术时间、腹壁切口长度和术中出血量均少于开腹组,系膜完整率高于开腹组(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组患者的术后肛门排气时间、进食流质食物时间、术后离床时间和住院时间均短于开腹组,术后镇痛需求率较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后排便困难、排便紧迫感和肛门满意的发生率相近,排便频率和Wexner评分相近,两组患者术后2年生存率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组并发症发生率为5.5%,开腹组为18.2%,两组患者并发症比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.274, P=0.039)。

结论

腹腔镜TME治疗超低位直肠癌的创伤小,患者术后恢复快,并发症少,且能达到和开腹TME手术相同的根治效果,远期疗效相仿,因此建议超低位直肠癌患者在条件允许的情况下选择腹腔镜TME治疗。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open TME for ultra low rectal cancer.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2015, 110 patients with ultra low rectal cancer who treated in our hospital were enrolled into this study, who were divided randomly into laparotomy group (55 cases) and laparoscopic group (55 cases). Clinical data were analyzed by using statistical software SPSS 21.0. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators and Wexner score were expressed as mean±standard deviation, and independent t test was used for comparison between the groups. Count data, such as membrane integrity rate, postoperative complication rate and survival, were expressed as %, and were examined by using χ2 test or Fisher exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The distal margins and harvested lymph nodes were similar in both groups (P>0.05). The operation time, abdominal incision length and intraoperative blood loss in laparoscopic group were less than those in laparotomy group respectively, and the mesangial integrity rate in the laparoscopic group was higher than that in the laparotomy group, with significant difference (P<0.05). Postoperative anal exhaust time, food intake time, postoperative ambulation time and hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were shorter than those in the laparotomy group respectively, while postoperative analgesia demand rate was lower in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). The incidence of defecation difficulty and urgency and anal satisfaction were similar between two groups. The frequency of defecation and Wexner score were similar. There was no significant difference of 2 year survival rate between two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of complications in the laparoscopy group was 5.5% and 18.2% in the laparotomy group, There were significant difference of complication rate between two groups (χ2=4.274, P=0.039).

Conclusion

Patients underwent laparoscopic TME for ultra-low rectal cancer could undergo less trauma, faster postoperative recovery, less complications, with the same curative effect and ong-term efficacy as open surgery, It is recommended that patients could selectively choose laparoscopic TME for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

表1 110例超低位直肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者的一般资料比较(±s)
表2 110例超低位直肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者的手术指标比较(±s)
表3 110例超低位直肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者的术后恢复情况比较(±s)
表4 110例超低位直肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者的术后肛门功能比较(±s)
[1]
Feng M,Fang X,Yang Q,et al.Association between the APC gene D1822V variant and the genetic susceptibility of colorectal cancer[J].Oncol Lett,2014,8(1):139-144.
[2]
Battersby NJ,How P,Moran B,et al. Prospective validation of a low rectal cancer magnetic resonance imaging staging system and development of a local recurrence risk stratification model: the MERCURY Ⅱ study[J]. Ann Surg,2016,263(4):751-760.
[3]
Cheng J,Chen Y,Wang X,et al.Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies of cigarette smoking and the incidence of colon and rectal cancers[J].Eur J Cancer Prev,2015,24(1): 6-15.
[4]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治腹部无切口经肛切除套入式吻合102例经验[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):25-29.
[5]
曾文革,徐建华.腹腔镜下与开腹保肛根治术对超低位直肠癌治疗效果比较[J].山东医药,2017,57(45):92-94.
[6]
马明辉,李井野.腹腔镜经肛门括约肌间切除术对距肛缘<5cm超低位直肠癌根治效果研究[J].中国医师杂志,2017,19(4):612-614.
[7]
王健,王永洪,王依宁,等.腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(4):311-314.
[8]
方复,卢国春,毛华辉.腹腔镜全系膜切除术联合经肛门内括约肌切除术治疗超低位直肠癌的疗效分析[J].中国全科医学,2017,15(4):724-726.
[9]
Matsumoto A, Arita K. Laparoscopic-Assisted Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer Using the Simple Rectum Catcher Device with an Intraoperative Colonoscopy: Results of Our Hospital Study in 203 Patients[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2016,23(12): 3941-3947.
[10]
沈晓明,刘如钱,鲍传庆.腹腔镜下全直肠系膜切除术联合经肛管括约肌间切除术在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用效果分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(17):131-132.
[11]
张忠涛,杨盈赤.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):1-4.
[12]
白宾,王建国.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位、超低位直肠癌的临床研究[J].临床外科杂志,2015,23(9):697-700.
[13]
曹金鹏,彭翔,郑建中,等.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术在肥胖直肠癌患者中的疗效评价[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(2):127-131.
[14]
伍家发,刘祖定,刘中宁,等.腹腔镜联合经肛门括约肌间超低位直肠癌切除术的临床疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(9):1188-1189.
[15]
梁平.腹腔镜下直肠低位前切除术与直肠经肛门拖出切除术治疗直肠癌的效果比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):46-48.
[1] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[2] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[3] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[4] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[9] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[10] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[11] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[12] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[13] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[14] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要