Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06): 529-531. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.06.025

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical efficacy of LC plus LCBDE and ERCP/EST followed by LC in treatment of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones in the elderly patients

Chen Zheng1, Xin Huang1,(), Wanlin Li1, Wen Zeng1, Yawei Shen1   

  1. 1. First Department of General Surgery, Xi’an Central Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710003, China
  • Received:2018-01-23 Online:2018-12-26 Published:2018-12-26
  • Contact: Xin Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Xin, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of LC plus LCBDE and ERCP/EST followed by LC in treatment of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones in the elderly patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients of concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones treated with minimally invasive surgical treatment in our hospital from November 2015 to October 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients, 40 cases received LC plus LCBDE (LCBDE+ LC group), and 40 cases underwent ERCP followed by LC (ERCP/EST+ LC group). Research data was analyzed by SPSS 19.0 statistical software, the clinical data were shown as (±s), and compared with independent t test, the incidence of complication such as the residual stone rate and postoperative complication rate were compared with χ2 test, and P<0.05 was regarded to be statistically significant.

Results

In LC+ LCBDE group versus ERCP/EST+ LC group, the surgical success rate (95.0% vs. 90.0%) and incidence of postoperative complications (7.5% vs. 10.0%) showed no significant difference(P>0.05), but the hospitalization cost was significantly decreased (P<0.05) and length of hospital stay was significantly shortened in the LC+ LCBDE group (P<0.05). The residual stone rate showed no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Both groups were followed up for 3 to 24 months; the incidence of stone recurrence and biliary tract infections showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion

The two types of operation are both safe and effective. It is suggested that the clinical practice should be selected and applied in accordance with the actual condition of the elderly patients.

Key words: Cholelithiasis, Choledocholithiasis, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Aged, 80 and over

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd