Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06): 494-496. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.06.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of different surgical procedures in treating patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Wenbin Hong1,(), Yan Gu2   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhabei Central Hospital (Jingan Branch of Huashan Hospital), Fushan University, Shanghai 200070, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, The Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2018-04-02 Online:2018-12-26 Published:2018-12-26
  • Contact: Wenbin Hong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hong Wenbin, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(NO.81270444)

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the effect of different surgical procedures in treating patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis were performed in 221 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis from January 2013 to June 2016 in our hospital, who were divided into laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group (emergency LC, n=152), percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) + LC group (n=46) and open cholecystectomy (OC) group (n=23). Baseline and clinical data were compared between three groups. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS19.0 statistical software. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were expressed as mean±standard deviation and examined by using t-test and analysis of variance. The incidence of postoperative complications and baseline data were compared by using chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

⑴Age and severity of cholecystitis in PTGD+ LC group were significantly higher than those in other two groups respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant difference between three groups in terms of gender, preoperative clinical symptoms and liver function indexes (P>0.05). ⑵Operation time in PTGD+ LC group was significantly higher than that in LC group, and total hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses in PTGD+ LC group were significantly higher than those in other two groups respectively (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in OC group was significantly higher than that in other two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference of conversion rate between LC group and PTGD+ LC group (P >0.05). There was no significant difference of the incidence of postoperative complications between three groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

For patients with acute calculous cholecystitis without obvious surgical contraindications, emergency LC is the preferred treatment method. For those who could not undergo emergency surgery, PTGD cuold be performed first, then considering the next step.

Key words: Cholecystitis, Acute, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Gallstones, Cholecystectomy, Laparotomy

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd