Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 260-263. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.03.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical investigation of the intestinal mucosal barrier function of patients after LPD based on ERAS principles

Wei Geng1, Jinru Peng2, Xueqi Zhao2, Xiaowen Cao2   

  1. 1. Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Shaanxi 710100, China; Tangdu Hospital The Fourth Military Medical University
    2. Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital, Shaanxi 710100, China
  • Received:2019-08-27 Online:2020-06-26 Published:2020-06-26
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cui Lihong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province(2017068625)

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the intestinal mucosal barrier function of patients after LPD based on ERAS principles.

Method

A retrospective analysis was performed in 145 patients with LPD from January 2015 to December 2018, who were divided into ERAS group (78 cases) and traditional group (67 cases) according to perioperative treatment protocols. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS24.0 software. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators and intestinal mucosal barrier function were represented as (±s) and were examined by using independent t test. Postoperative complications were expressed as n(%) and were analyzed by using χ2 test. Kaplan-meier method was used for survival analysis. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistical significant difference.

Results

The postoperative recovery in the ERAS group were significantly better than those in the traditional group, in terms of first exhaust time, first oral-feeding time, drainage tube extubation time and postoperative hospitalization time (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between two groups of mortality rate (P>0.05). The incidence of 3.8% gastric emptying delay in ERAS group (3 cases) was significantly less than 7.5% in traditional group (5 cases), with significant difference (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups of other complications rate (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups of intestinal mucosal barrier function after LPD (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Based on ERAS principles, better clinical effect could be achieved after LPD with improved intestinal mucosal barrier function.

Key words: Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Enhanced recovery after surgery, Rehabilitation, Intestinal mucosa

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd