Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01): 19-21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.01.008

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of combined minimally invasive surgical treatments for rectal cancer

Lei Liang1,(), Yuanting Liu1, Chunliang Jia1, Yuan Yao1, Kai Kang1, Lei Zhang1, Hansong Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tangshan people’s hospital, HeBei, 063000 China
  • Received:2018-06-30 Online:2019-02-26 Published:2019-02-26
  • Contact: Lei Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Lei, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate success rate and influential factors of laparoscopic colorectal resections (LCRs) followed by natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

From April 2016 to April 2018, retrospective analysis were performed in 76 patients with rectal cancer who received LCRs+ NOSE. We prefer to anal approach firstly, however if it fails, vaginal approach would be tried. If both approaches fail, the patient would be judged to be unsuitable for NOSE, then specimen would be removed through abdominal incision. Surgical indications, location of excision, procedure, incision site, method of aspiration, specimen size, and NOSE failure were recorded. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS18.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data, and the chi-square test of the success and failure cases of NOSE was used to analyze the data. The size of specimens was examined by t-test. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

7 cases of conversions to open abdominal incision occurred during operation. 51 (73.9%) patients, including 48(94.1%) cases of anal approach and 3 (5.9%) cases of vagina approach, received successful NOSE after LCRs, while 18 (26.1%) cases failed A lower success rate of NOSE occurred mainly in male patients with severe colon lesions and large tumor size. The mean size of removed specimens was (3.6±3.2) and (5.6±1.5) cm by using anal approach and vaginal approach respectively, and the mean tumor size of the failed cases was (6.6±4.4) cm (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Better prognosis could be achieved in patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic resection + NOSE, while higher success rate could be achieved when milder lesions or in female patients.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Natural orifice endoscopic surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd