切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 555 -558. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.05.020

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良VSD装置在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流中的临床应用价值
郭雯, 任谊, 魏庆忠()   
  1. 100076 北京,北京航天总医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-27 出版日期:2025-10-26
  • 通信作者: 魏庆忠

Clinical application value of modified VSD device in axillary drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer

Wen Guo, Yi Ren, Qingzhong Wei()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing 100076, China
  • Received:2025-03-27 Published:2025-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Qingzhong Wei
引用本文:

郭雯, 任谊, 魏庆忠. 改良VSD装置在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 555-558.

Wen Guo, Yi Ren, Qingzhong Wei. Clinical application value of modified VSD device in axillary drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 555-558.

目的

探讨改良负压封闭引流(VSD)装置在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流的临床价值。

方法

前瞻性纳入2021年1月至2023年12月接受乳腺癌改良根治术的108例患者,采用区组随机化法由独立统计人员通过SPSS 25.0生成随机序列将患者按1:1分配至改良组和对照组,每组患者各54例。改良组采用改良VSD装置引流,对照组采用传统硅胶负压引流球引流。SPSS 25.0软件进行数据分析,肿瘤部位等计数资料以[例(%)]表示,采用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法行组间比较;符合正态分布的肩关节活动情况等计量资料用(±s)描述,采用独立样本t检验。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

改良组患者术后肩关节前屈、外展、内收及后伸活动度均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。改良组患者拔管时间、总引流量及引流管堵塞率均显著低于对照组,而切口甲级愈合率显著提高(P<0.05)。改良组患者并发症总发生率(5.6%)较对照组(18.5%)显著降低(P<0.05)。

结论

接受改良根治术的乳腺癌患者术后腋窝引流的临床应用中,改良VSD装置获得了较好的临床效果,其不仅显著提升了肩关节活动度和切口甲级愈合率,还显著缩短了置管天数、减少了总引流量、降低了引流管堵塞率及并发症总发生率,具有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of a modified vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) device in axillary drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 108 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2021 to December 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Using a block randomization method, independent statisticians generated random sequences via SPSS 25.0 to allocate patients at a 1:1 ratio into a modified group and a control group, with 54 patients in each group. The modified group received drainage using the modified VSD device, while the control group received drainage using a traditional silicone negative pressure drainage ball. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0. Enumeration data such as tumor location were expressed as [cases (%)], and intergroup comparisons were conducted using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability method. Measurement data conforming to normal distribution, such as shoulder joint mobility, were described by (±s), and independent sample t tests were used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The ranges of motion for postoperative shoulder joint flexion, abduction, adduction, and extension in the modified group were significantly better than those in the control group (P<0.05). The extubation time, total drainage volume, and drainage tube blockage rate in the modified group were significantly lower than those in the control group, while the first-class wound healing rate was significantly higher (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the modified group (5.6%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (18.5%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In the clinical application of axillary drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, the modified VSD device has achieved favorable clinical effects. It not only significantly improves shoulder joint mobility and the first-class wound healing rate but also significantly shortens the indwelling catheter days, reduces the total drainage volume, and decreases the drainage tube blockage rate and the total incidence of complications, demonstrating high clinical application value.

表1 两组行乳腺癌改良根治术患者基本资料对比
表2 两组行乳腺癌改良根治术患者肩关节活动情况对比(°,±s
表3 两组行乳腺癌改良根治术患者引流及切口愈合情况对比
[1]
Lin L, Li Z, Yan L, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence and death for 29 cancer groups in 2019 and trends analysis of the global cancer burden, 1990-2019[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2021, 14(1): 197.
[2]
熊洁,段志财,左怀全. 中美乳腺癌流行病学特征对比及防控策略分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2024, 31(01): 50-55.
[3]
Trayes KP, Cokenakes SEH. Breast Cancer Treatment. Am Fam Physician[J]. 2021, 104(2): 171-178.
[4]
刘子棋,戴建国. 乳腺癌改良根治术研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2024, 40(08): 1349-1352, 1357.
[5]
吴雪莲,胥润,李霞. 不同引流及加压方式对乳腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2020, 20(06): 8-10.
[6]
陈琛,陈昱名,段奇,等. 乳腺癌改良根治术后不同引流方法对皮下积液和皮瓣坏死的预防效果观察[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(06): 997-999.
[7]
Song J, Liu X, Wu T. Effectiveness of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis [J]. Int Wound J, 2023, 20(2): 241-250.
[8]
陈秋芸,王磊. 负压封闭引流在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流中的应用优势[J]. 名医, 2023, 11: 12-14.
[9]
方小文,杨世昕,陈平,等. 改进的VSD装置在乳腺改良根治术后的应用价值[J]. 实用临床医学, 2022, 23(01): 35-38.
[10]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040.
[11]
李晓. 肩关节镜下肩袖修补术后舒适护理及康复训练效果评估[J]. 科学养生, 2021, 24(01): 275.
[12]
Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Thürlimann B, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021[J]. Ann Oncol, 2021, 32(10): 1216-1235.
[13]
苏明,唐丹萍,王萍,等. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方法选择研究进展[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 231-234.
[14]
吴畏,邱冬梅,赵洁玉. 负压封闭引流在乳腺癌改良根治术后腋窝引流中的应用价值[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2019, 26(02): 221-223.
[15]
Wu W, Qiu J, Fang Y, et al. A portable vacuum-sealing drainage device [J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(2): 1025-1026.
[16]
Liu J, Chen D, Yin X. Effect of manual lymphatic drainage combined with vacuum sealing drainage on axillary web syndrome caused by breast cancer surgery[J]. Int Wound J, 2023, 20(1): 183-190.
[17]
张钊,骆成玉,张树琦,等. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[18]
雷伟娜,马春娇,陈珠贤. 乳腺癌术后两种引流方式的效果比较[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2021, 27(20): 3260-3262.
[19]
Rao D, Xie J, Xia Y, et al. Comparison of Flap Fixation to Its Bed and Conventional Wound Closure with Drainage in Preventing Seroma Formation Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2022, 46(3): 1180-1188.
[1] 姜明霞, 李俏, 徐兵河. 局部晚期HER-2阳性乳腺癌的新辅助治疗[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 129-138.
[2] 徐颖, 宋雨, 黄欣, 周易冬, 孙强, 林燕. 精准医学时代局部晚期乳腺癌的诊治热点[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 139-144.
[3] 马庆东, 万韦君, 罗东林. CD83通过ITGB1/FAK信号通路调控三阴性乳腺癌细胞迁移和侵袭[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 145-153.
[4] 钟凯欣, 胡嘉薇, 罗梓轩, 熊尧, 陈创. 乳腺乳头状肿瘤微生物组成及与核梭杆菌属的关系[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 154-159.
[5] 雒家玲, 徐冬冬, 司迪堃, 胡文钰, 李南林. 乳腺癌患者与非乳腺癌人群BRCA1/2基因突变率的差异分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 160-166.
[6] 郑仁英, 罗凤梅, 李婷婷, 金勇, 万小亚. 吡咯替尼治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 167-174.
[7] 张佳宁, 任予. 上臂输液港在乳腺癌患者中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 175-178.
[8] 王晨曦, 姚心怡, 石汪琼, 杜丽萍. 乳腺癌患者复发风险感知的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 179-181.
[9] 李陈钰, 贺青卿, 庄大勇, 周鹏, 岳涛, 邵长秀, 徐婧, 李小磊. 乳腺、肺及甲状腺同时性三原发癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 188-189.
[10] 金钰婷, 苑龙, 齐晓伟, 姜军. 乳腺癌非根治性手术临床研究证据[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 65-69.
[11] 李金泽, 彭雅琪, 刘月平, 马力. 乳腺癌HER-2低表达及超低表达临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 70-75.
[12] 慕春燕, 杨大伟, 张云东, 崔兆清. E1A结合蛋白P300与乳腺癌发生发展的关系研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 111-115.
[13] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[14] 张克俭, 赵建红, 尚培中, 张克勤, 张少斌, 王铁山. 乳腺癌肺转移术后化疗并发骨髓增生异常和Sweet综合征一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 471-472.
[15] 苏明, 唐丹萍, 王萍, 何谦. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方法选择研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 231-234.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?