切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 200 -202. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.02.028

所属专题: 文献

论著

双镜联合手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的安全性及细胞炎性因子改善研究
戈建辉1, 徐雨1, 汪斌1, 丁佑铭1,()   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉,武汉大学人民医院肝胆腔镜外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-14 出版日期:2019-04-26
  • 通信作者: 丁佑铭

Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy for the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts complicated with severe acute pancreatitis and improvement of inflammatory cytokines

Jianhui Ge1, Yu Xu1, Bin Wang1, Youming Ding1,()   

  1. 1. Hepatobiliary surgery, people’s Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060
  • Received:2018-06-14 Published:2019-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Youming Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Youming, Email:
引用本文:

戈建辉, 徐雨, 汪斌, 丁佑铭. 双镜联合手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的安全性及细胞炎性因子改善研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 200-202.

Jianhui Ge, Yu Xu, Bin Wang, Youming Ding. Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy for the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts complicated with severe acute pancreatitis and improvement of inflammatory cytokines[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 200-202.

目的

探讨双镜联合手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的安全性及细胞炎性因子的改善情况。

方法

回顾性分析2015年4月至2017年3月86例重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿患者资料,根据治疗方案的不同分为开腹组(n=40)与双镜组(n=46,采用十二指肠镜与腹腔镜的联合治疗)。采用SPSS20.0统计学软件分析,两组患者并发症发生率采用χ2检验比较;术中术后各项指标、血清炎性因子水平等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

双镜组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、腹痛缓解时间、排气时间、体温恢复时间等均明显优于开腹组患者(P<0.05);双镜组术后并发症的发生率7.5%明显低于开腹组患者26.1%(P<0.05);术后双镜组患者IL-18、IL-6与TNF-α水平明显低于开腹组患者(P<0.05)。

结论

采用双镜联合手术方案治疗重症急性胰腺炎合并胰腺假性囊肿,手术效果更好,术后并发症较少,可有效改善患者的临床症状,值得临床进一步应用推广。

Objective

To investigate the safety of Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy for the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts complicated with severe acute pancreatitis and the improvement of inflammatory cytokines.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 86 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts complicated with severe acute pancreatitis from April 2015 to March 2017 was studied. According to the treatment plan, patients were divided into Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy group (n=46) and laparotomy group (n=40) In the Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy group, endoscopic and laparoscopic treatments were used. In the open group, traditional open surgery was used. SPSS20.0 statistical software was used to analyze. The incidence of complications between the two groups were compared using the χ2 test. The measurement data of each index and serum inflammatory factor level during the operation were expressed as (±s), and compared with Independent t test, P<0.05meant the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and other surgical indicators in the Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy group were significantly lower than those in the open group (P<0.05); abdominal pain relief time, exhaust time, and body temperature recovery time in the Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopygroup were significantly better than those in the open group (P<0.05); the incidence of postoperative complications in the Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy group was significantly lower than that in the open group (7.5% vs. 26.1%) (P<0.05); The levels of IL-18, IL-6 and TNF-α in the patients of the Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy group were significantly lower than those in the open group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of Laparoscopy combined with duodenoscopy to treat pancreatic pseudocysts complicated with severe acute pancreatitis has better surgical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications, which can effectively improve the patient’s clinical symptoms and is worthy of further clinical application.

表1 86例重症急性胰腺炎并发PPC患者不同术式两组患者基线资料[(±s),例]
表2 86例重症急性胰腺炎并发PPC患者不同术式两组手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 86例重症急性胰腺炎并发PPC患者不同术式两组临床症状改善情况(±s)
表4 86例重症急性胰腺炎并发PPC患者不同术式两组并发症发生率比较(例)
表5 86例重症急性胰腺炎并发PPC患者不同术式两组血清炎性因子水平比较(±s)
[1]
Jagielski M, Smoczyński M, Adrych K. The role of transpapillary drainage in management of patients with pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption as a consequences of severe acute pancreatitis.[J].Pancreatology, 2017, 17(1):30-31.
[2]
罗耀兵,江建新,张岚,等.内镜腹腔镜联合治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的疗效分析[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017 , 11(2) :132-135.
[3]
吴克松,周载平,黄宇,等.重症急性胰腺炎合并胰腺假性囊肿的微创手术治疗[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016 ,19(1):42-43.
[4]
孙昀. 重症急性胰腺炎早期并发症的防治[J]. 肝胆外科杂志,2016,24(1):10-13.
[5]
温志华,王旺河,张迎旭,等. 内镜联合腹腔镜治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假囊肿的疗效观察[J]. 中国实用医刊,2017,44(16): 53-55.
[6]
Cui B, Zhou L, Khan S, et al. Role of enteral nutrition in pancreaticocolonic fistulas secondary to severe acute pancreatitis: A case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017, 96(49):e9054.
[7]
赵泽新. 内镜联合腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的效果比较[J]. 中国临床新医学,2016, 9 (7) : 635-637.
[8]
Kim HJ, Jun CH, Park CH, et a1.Intrahepatic Pancreatic Pseudocyst Complicated by Pancreatitis: A Case Report.[J].Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017, 70(4): 202-207.
[9]
王军保.内镜与腹腔镜联合治疗SAP并发胰腺假性囊肿患者效果观察及对应激反应的影响[J].全科医学临床与教育,2016, 14(6):646-649.
[10]
王晓光. 内镜-腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发胰腺假性囊肿的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床新医学,2016, 9(9): 806-808.
[11]
廖敏琪,刘吉祥,夏亮,等. 重症急性胰腺炎合并胰腺假性囊肿治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国医药导报,2016, 13(21): 66-69.
[12]
张永红. 内镜联合腹腔镜手术治疗重症急性胰腺炎合并胰腺假性囊肿的临床研究[J]. 中国医学工程,2017,25(2):19-23.
[13]
Sharma D, Jakkampudi A, Reddy R, et al. Association of Systemic Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Responses with Adverse Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: Preliminary Results of an Ongoing Study.[J]. Dig Dis Sci. 2017,62(12):3468-3478.
[14]
Soyalp M, Yalcin M, Oter V, et al. Investigation of procalcitonin, IL-6, oxidative stress index (OSI) plasma and tissue levels in experimental mild and severe pancreatitis in rats[J]. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2017, 118(3):137-141.
[15]
Chen QJ, Yang ZY, Wang CY, et a1. Hydroxyethyl starch resuscitation downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis: A retrospective study[J].Exp Ther Med. 2016, 12(5):3213-3220.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?