切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 279 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.03.020

论著

中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值与乳腺癌的关联性及预测效能研究
何宇杭1, 曹中伟1,2,()   
  1. 1 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学内蒙古临床医学院
    2 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学内蒙古自治区人民医院甲乳疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-06-26
  • 通信作者: 曹中伟

Study on the correlation and predictive efficacy of neutrophil percentage-albumin ratio in breast cancer

Yuhang He1, Zhongwei Cao1,2,()   

  1. 1 Inner Mongolia Clinical Medical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010017, China
    2 Department of Thoracic, Breast, and Hernia Surgery, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010017, China
  • Received:2025-12-22 Published:2026-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhongwei Cao
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(2019MS08005)
引用本文:

何宇杭, 曹中伟. 中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值与乳腺癌的关联性及预测效能研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 279-283.

Yuhang He, Zhongwei Cao. Study on the correlation and predictive efficacy of neutrophil percentage-albumin ratio in breast cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 279-283.

目的

探讨外周血中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值(NPAR)与乳腺癌的关联性,并评估其对乳腺癌的临床预测效能。

方法

选取2016年1月至12月109例乳腺恶性肿瘤患者(恶性组)、94例乳腺良性肿瘤患者(良性组),同时纳入同期100例健康女性作为对照组,检测三组研究对象外周血中性粒细胞百分比、血清白蛋白水平并计算NPAR,通过统计学方法分析组间指标差异,采用二元Logistic回归探讨NPAR与乳腺癌发病风险的相关性,利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估其诊断价值。

结果

恶性组NPAR、中性粒细胞比值均显著高于良性组和健康组,血清白蛋白水平则显著低于后两组,三组间NPAR差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);恶性组中不同分子分型、腋窝淋巴结转移状态、组织学分级等临床特征亚组的NPAR比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明,未纳入年龄校正时,NPAR是乳腺癌发生的显著危险因素(P<0.05),但纳入年龄后其关联性消失(P=0.820),而年龄为乳腺癌的独立危险因素(OR=1.077, 95%CI: 1.043-1.113, P<0.001);外周血中性粒细胞比值、血清白蛋白与乳腺癌发病无显著统计学关联(P均>0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,年龄用于区分乳腺癌与乳腺良性肿瘤的AUC为0.747(95%CI: 0.680-0.815),最佳临界值为45.5岁,敏感度为61.5%,特异度为76.6%;NPAR区分乳腺癌与乳腺良性肿瘤的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.732(95%CI: 0.667-0.797),最佳临界值为11.88,敏感度75.2%,特异度61.7%;年龄、NPAR二者联合用于区分乳腺癌与乳腺良性肿瘤的AUC为0.799(95%CI: 0.739-0.859),敏感度为75.2%,特异度为74.5%。

结论

NPAR在乳腺恶性肿瘤、良性肿瘤及健康人群中存在显著差异,未校正年龄时与乳腺癌风险相关,但其作用受年龄混杂或调节;年龄是乳腺癌明确的独立危险因素,NPAR作为乳腺癌独立风险因子的证据尚不充分。检测NPAR可辅助临床识别乳腺癌,但其临床应用价值仍需大样本、多中心研究进一步验证。

Objective

To investigate the correlation between peripheral blood neutrophil percentage-albumin ratio (NPAR) and breast cancer, and to evaluate its clinical predictive efficacy for breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 109 patients with malignant breast tumors (malignant group), 94 patients with benign breast tumors (benign group) from January to December 2016 were enrolled, and 100 healthy women during the same period were included as the control group. Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage and serum albumin level were measured in the three groups, and NPAR was calculated. Intergroup differences in the indicators were analyzed by statistical methods. Binary Logistic regression was used to explore the correlation between NPAR and the risk of breast cancer, and ROC curve was applied to assess its diagnostic value.

Results

NPAR and neutrophil percentage in the malignant group were significantly higher than those in the benign group and healthy group, while serum albumin level was significantly lower than that in the latter two groups. The difference in NPAR among the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the malignant group, there were no statistically significant differences in NPAR among subgroups with different clinical characteristics, including molecular subtypes, axillary lymph node metastasis status, and histological grade (P>0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that NPAR was a significant risk factor for breast cancer before adjustment for age (P<0.05), but the correlation disappeared after age adjustment (P=0.820), whereas age was an independent risk factor for breast cancer (OR=1.077, 95%CI: 1.043-1.113, P<0.001). Peripheral blood neutrophil percentage and serum albumin showed no significant statistical correlation with the incidence of breast cancer (all P>0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC of age for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast tumors was 0.747 (95%CI: 0.680-0.815), with an optimal cutoff value of 45.5 years, a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 76.6%. The area under the curve (AUC) of NPAR for distinguishing breast cancer from benign breast tumors was 0.732 (95%CI: 0.667-0.797), with an optimal cutoff value of 11.88, a sensitivity of 75.2% and a specificity of 61.7%. The combined use of age and NPAR for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast tumors yielded an AUC of 0.799 (95%CI: 0.739-0.859), with a sensitivity of 75.2% and a specificity of 74.5%.

Conclusion

NPAR differs significantly among patients with malignant breast tumors, benign breast tumors and healthy individuals. It is associated with breast cancer risk before age adjustment, but its effect is confounded or modulated by age. Age is a definite independent risk factor for breast cancer, while the evidence supporting NPAR as an independent risk factor for breast cancer is insufficient. Detection of NPAR can assist in the clinical identification of breast cancer, but its clinical application value still needs to be further verified by large-sample and multicenter studies.

表1 三组人群相关实验室指标比较(
±s
表2 NPAR与乳腺癌发病风险的Logistic回归分析
表3 109例恶性组患者不同临床特征的NPAR比较(dl/g,
±s
图1 年龄、NPAR及二者联合应用诊断乳腺癌的ROC曲线
[1]
Bray FLaversanne MSung H,et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263.
[2]
高杰红,黎平平,齐婧,等. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2025,19(1):64-67.
[3]
Liu CFChien LW. Predictive Role of Neutrophil-Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio(NPAR)in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Nondiabetic US Adults: Evidence from NHANES 2017-2018[J]. Nutrients,2023,15(8):1892.
[4]
Wu CCWu CHLee CH,et al. Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio(NPAR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR)and long-term mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure: evidence from US NHANES 2005-2016[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2023,23(1):312.
[5]
Wang LLiu LLiu X,et al. The association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio(NPAR)and depression among US adults: a cross-sectional study[J]. Sci Rep,2024,14(1):21880.
[6]
Lan CCSu WLYang MC,et al. Predictive role of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin,neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratios for mortality in patients with COPD: Evidence from NHANES 2011-2018[J]. Respirology,2023,28(12):1136-1146.
[7]
Bi LLiang JHu K. Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio(NPAR)as a biomarker for asthma: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data[J]. BMC Pulm Med,2025,25(1):269.
[8]
Ko CAFang KHTsai MS,et al. Prognostic Value of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer[J]. Cancers(Basel),2022,14(19):4892.
[9]
Liang HPan KWang J,et al. Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and breast cancer in adult women in the US: findings from the NHANES[J]. Front Nutr,2025,12:1533636.
[10]
孙曼迪,符德元. 评估应用术前PLR、NLR及AGR预测乳腺癌患者预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(2):137-141.
[11]
Xiao YYu D. Tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in cancer[J]. Pharmacol Ther,2021,221:107753.
[12]
Que HFu QLan T,et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils and neutrophil-targeted cancer therapies[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer,2022,1877(5):188762.
[13]
王浩泽,顾炎. 中性粒细胞在肿瘤发生发展及免疫治疗中的作用[J]. 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2024,31(5):507-513.
[14]
Hoogenboezem ENDuvall CL. Harnessing albumin as a carrier for cancer therapies[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev,2018,130:73-89.
[15]
Setrerrahmane SXu H. Tumor-related interleukins: old validated targets for new anti-cancer drug development[J]. Mol Cancer,2017,16(1):153.
[16]
Wang BLi DCheng B,et al. The Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio Is Associated with All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury[J]. Biomed Res Int,2020,2020:5687672.
[1] 中国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌专家委员会, 中国医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会, 广东省药学会. 乳腺癌内分泌治疗超说明书用药专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 69-81.
[2] 莫遵玉, 赖莉萍, 李水平, 葛肖艳. 基于多种超声参数构建乳腺癌高负荷腋窝淋巴结转移的预测模型[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 82-90.
[3] 肖晓, 张心蓝, 汤怡梅, 吴玉婷, 周云, 韩晓蓉. 切除活检与空芯针穿刺活检在乳腺癌患者保留乳房手术中的对比分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 91-97.
[4] 肖佳, 王寅欢, 苏小君, 章国智, 李丹, 吴丹, 杨英. 乳腺癌患者首次日间化疗出院准备度与医学应对方式的相关性[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 98-103.
[5] 李会霞, 王文东, 杜鹏, 邢文豪, 刘悦琦, 密雪芳, 邓萌, 葛新. 妊娠相关乳腺癌发病机制及诊疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 104-108.
[6] 刘天航, 刘志坤, 张安度. 新辅助化疗乳腺癌患者术后放射治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 109-114.
[7] 冯学乾, 王千丹, 张旭. 乳腺叶状肿瘤的诊疗进展与全程管理策略[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-119.
[8] 杨莉金, 任丹丹, 朱红梅, 张馨丹, 袁三英. 特级初榨橄榄油对乳腺癌发病风险及预后影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 120-123.
[9] 邵长华, 刘夕水, 李恒宇. 乳腺癌患者注射用紫杉醇(白蛋白结合型)化疗致肝功能衰竭一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 124-127.
[10] 罗成, 曾英, 谭小波, 陈飞, 赵松. 男性副乳乳腺癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 128-130.
[11] 仲洋杨, 邓舒瑶, 李永杰, 李庄. 男性隐匿性乳腺癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 60-63.
[12] 张玉冬, 鲁磊, 尚宏清, 李伟, 刘湘晨, 王冰涛, 朱莉丽, 付马墨阳, 许宸玮. 复合式冷冻-热消融技术治疗乳腺纤维腺瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 64-66.
[13] 中华医学会超声医学分会, 中国研究型医院肿瘤介入治疗委员会, 中国妇幼保健协会乳腺保健专业委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国人体健康科技促进会乳腺专业委员会. 无手术适应证乳腺癌消融治疗专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-8.
[14] 罗仲燃, 曾智豪, 黄梦娟, 何晓艺. 乳腺癌术后腋窝淋巴结负荷的多因素分析及预测模型的建立及验证[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 46-50.
[15] 赵立成, 孙倩, 史进, 王园园, 杜银苹, 董国华, 贾琳莹, 周子益, 胡雪婷. 血清炎症标志物预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病预后的临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 83-88.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?