切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 485 -489. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.05.017

论著

腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术中轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片的临床效果对比研究
刘宝平†(), 徐爱忠   
  1. 246000 安徽安庆,安庆市立医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-29 出版日期:2026-10-26
  • 通信作者: 刘宝平

A comparative study on clinical efficacy of lightweight polypropylene mesh and self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

Baoping Liu†(), Aizhong Xu   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing Anhui Province 246000, China
  • Received:2025-09-29 Published:2026-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Baoping Liu
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Wannan Medical College(WK2023JXYY025)
引用本文:

刘宝平, 徐爱忠. 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术中轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 485-489.

Baoping Liu, Aizhong Xu. A comparative study on clinical efficacy of lightweight polypropylene mesh and self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 485-489.

目的

探究腹腔镜完全经腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片的临床效果。

方法

采用前瞻性队列研究,选取2022年3月至2024年3月男性腹股沟疝患者120例,根据其TEP中应用补片的不同,将其分为聚丙烯组(n=58)和自固定组(n=62),采用SPSS 27.0统计学软件分析数据,用t检验和重复测量设计方差分析比较两组患者临床资料、手术指标、手术前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后并发症及随访期间复发情况,检验水准α=0.05。

结果

两组患者临床资料差异无统计学意义。聚丙烯组手术时间长于自固定组,治疗费用低于自固定组,差异具有统计学意义(t=2.063、10.406,P均<0.05)。两组患者术后 VAS 评分均随时间显著降低,组内不同时间点的差异均具有统计学意义(F时间=290.688,P<0.05)。自固定补片组整体 VAS 评分低于聚丙烯组,该组别间主效应差异具有统计学意义(F分组=13.318,P<0.05)。同时,两组 VAS 评分随时间变化的趋势存在差异,时间 × 组别的交互效应具有统计学意义(F交互=4.382,P<0.05),两组患者术后1个月和2个月VAS评分差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后并发症及随访期间复发情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜完全经腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中,轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片术后并发症发生率及疝复发风险无差异,安全性相当。术中采用自固定补片患者手术时间短、术后疼痛程度轻,术中采用轻量聚丙烯补片价格更低。临床可结合患者自身条件,差异化选择补片。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of lightweight polypropylene mesh versus self-gripping mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 120 male patients with inguinal hernia treated from March 2022 to March 2024 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the polypropylene group (n=58) and the self-gripping group (n=62) according to the type of mesh used during TEP. Statistical analyses were performed via SPSS 27.0 software. The t test and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to compare baseline clinical data, intraoperative parameters, pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, postoperative complications and hernia recurrence during follow-up between the two groups. The significance level was set at (alpha=0.05).

Results

No statistically significant differences were found in baseline clinical data between the two groups. The polypropylene group had longer operative time but lower total medical costs than the self-gripping group, with statistically significant differences (t=2.063), (t=10.406), all (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS pain scores of both groups decreased markedly over time, and the differences across time points within each group were statistically significant (Ftime=290.688), (P<0.05). The overall VAS scores of the self-gripping mesh group were lower than those of the polypropylene group, and the main effect between groups was statistically significant (Fgroup=13.318), (P<0.05). In addition, the changing trends of VAS scores over time differed between the two groups, and the time-by-group interaction effect reached statistical significance (Finteraction=4.382), (P<0.05). Significant intergroup differences in VAS scores were detected at 1 month and 2 months after surgery (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in postoperative complication rates or hernia recurrence rates during follow-up (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP), lightweight polypropylene mesh and self-gripping mesh demonstrate equivalent safety with no differences in postoperative complication rates or long-term hernia recurrence risks. The use of self-gripping mesh shortens operative duration and alleviates postoperative pain, whereas lightweight polypropylene mesh boasts a lower cost. Clinicians may select mesh products individually based on each patient's actual situation.

图1 腹直肌后鞘的疏松间隙向下游离
图2 腹壁下血管
图3 闭孔神经
图4 游离完成放置两侧补片后
图5 疝后铺平补片未缝合腹膜缺损
图6 两侧腹膜缺损缝合关闭完成
表1 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术两组患者临床资料比较
表2 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术两组患者手术指标及费用对比(
±s)
表3 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术两组患者手术前后VAS评分比较(分,
±s)
表4 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术两组患者术后并发症及复发情况比较(例)
[1]
陈双,唐健雄,周太成,等. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2025,45(2): 121-127.
[2]
Jakobsson E,Lundström KJ,Holmberg H,et al. Chronic Pain After Groin Hernia Surgery in Women: A Patient-reported Outcome Study Based on Data From the Swedish Hernia Register[J]. Ann Surg, 2022,275(2):213-219.
[3]
中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组,中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,陈双,等. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(3):409-417.
[4]
Zhang CW,Wu WD,Xu JW,et al. Single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal retrieval of retroperitoneal vas deferens in vasovasostomy for obstructive azoospermia patients postchildhood bilateral herniorrhaphy[J]. Asian journal of andrology,2025,27(1): 137-138.
[5]
Wang D,Jiang J,Fu Y,et al. The comparison of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis[J]. Updates in Surgery,2022,74(3): 857-863.
[6]
秦昌富,申英末. 生物可降解补片在青少年和青壮年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2023,22(9): 1047-1053.
[7]
杨泽成,史常赛,陈佳乐,等. 轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片在Lichtenstein疝修补术的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2023,17(1): 28-31.
[8]
江华,徐旻博,彭清.自固定补片对降低TAPP术后慢性疼痛的研究[J]. 中国实用医药,2023,18(8): 53-55.
[9]
佟贵繁,王峰,杜瑞,等. 造口旁疝的外科治疗现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2022,16(1):115-118.
[10]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2025,24(2): 143-150.
[11]
乔春玲,张钰琪,李彦彦,等. 经脐单部位腹腔镜手术联合右美托咪定对先天性肠闭锁患儿肠内营养的影响[J]. 世界临床药物,2025,46(3): 260-265,276.
[12]
Robert Hwang Theo Pelly,Prajeshan Nirmalan,Zane Perkins. Inguinal and femoral hernias[J]. BMJ(Clinical researched),2024,386(8437): e07953.
[13]
Wen GY,Kang HN,Xu Y,et al. Research trends on emergency inguinal Hernia: A bibliometric analysis[J]. Asian Journal of Surgery,2025,48(10): 6260-6261.
[14]
Stina Öberg,Jacob Rosenberg. Contemporary inguinal hernia management[J]. British Journal of Surgery,2022,109(3): 244-246.
[15]
Andrea Sanna,Roberto Cola,Luca Felicioni. A Non-randomized Comparative Study of Self-Fixing and Standard Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. Indian Journal of Surgery,2022,86(2): 1-7.
[16]
马锐,张成,郭一君,等. 自固定补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用临床疗效研究[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学,2023,11(1): 46-49.
[17]
陈佳乐,张佳贺,王新龙,等. 自固定补片在腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术中的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2025,19(2): 183-188.
[18]
段建平,朱林春,李志刚,等. 单孔腹腔镜联合ERAS策略在小儿腹股沟斜疝中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(5):578-580.
[19]
Andrea Sanna,Roberto Cola,Luca Felicioni. A Non-randomized Comparative Study of Self-Fixing and Standard Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. Indian Journal of Surgery,2024,86(2): 375-381.
[20]
Arun Kumar Gupta,Aman Raj,Devadatta Poddar,et al. New Four-fold Technique to Spread the Self-Gripping Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Surgery[J]. Indian Journal of Surgery,2024,86(2): 460-464.
[21]
肖旺,刘路遥,汪明明,等. 自固定补片与聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(1): 62-65.
[22]
李厚泽,綦晓龙. 自固定补片在腹腔镜疝修补术中疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2021,15(6):671-678.
[1] 王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明. α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.
[2] 程正武, 李浩然, 奚士航, 王俊峰. 后鞘后入路单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外补片修补术治疗腹股沟疝[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 394-398.
[3] 王英, 尤理想, 郑成, 吴石兵. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术用于老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 399-404.
[4] 高敬, 余安, 冯莉, 薛振峰. 智能镇痛与常规镇痛对腹股沟疝修补术后患者的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 405-409.
[5] 魏立国, 张英立, 张婧. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼在老年腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 415-422.
[6] 陈一帆, 周宇, 董金付. 不同加压方式在腹腔镜下腹股沟疝无张力修补术后的应用及对血清肿的预防分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 434-438.
[7] 王翠红, 蒋丽, 曹耀戈, 温雅, 黄宝玉. 马斯洛需求层次理论指导的干预策略对腹股沟疝患者术后早期行动力的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 439-444.
[8] 汪甲甲, 黄敏. 肝病相关血小板减少症合并腹股沟疝术后应用疝气带及精细化护理的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 445-447.
[9] 冉坤. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术在特殊解剖条件下的应用与优势[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 456-460.
[10] 黄伟, 林湘杰, 吴俊文, 胡浩, 杨雪菲. 部分可吸收补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 461-470.
[11] 李文婷, 黄欢. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血肿形成的危险因素及预防对策[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 296-300.
[12] 郑宇, 邱少凡, 宋春义, 张翔宇, 王佳, 马少卫. 不同腹腔镜手术对老年男性复发性腹股沟疝的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 307-312.
[13] 段飞, 杨尚, 毕旭东, 董永明, 赵琴, 张金柱. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与经腹股沟腹膜前修补术对单侧腹股沟疝患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 318-323.
[14] 华志鹏, 黄菏, 张维, 骆成林, 苏宁, 洪琼, 张宏文. 弓状线入路单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 324-328.
[15] 阴明, 唐翔宇, 李居剑, 赵铁彦. 完全腹膜外、经腹腹膜前与Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术的临床结局比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 329-333.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?