切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 374 -378. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2026.04.017

论著

融合病理图像与报告的多模态模型用于乳腺癌预后预测
袁强1,2, 范慈勃1,2, 韩丽丽1,2, 陈光1,2, 陈纲1,2,(), 赵锁3,()   
  1. 1 100700 北京,中国人民解放军总医院第七医学中心普通外科
    2 100853 北京,中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部
    3 264000 山东烟台,联勤保障部队第九七〇医院肝胆甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-28 出版日期:2026-08-26
  • 通信作者: 陈纲, 赵锁

Multimodal model integrating pathological images and reports for breast cancer prognosis prediction

Qiang Yuan1,2, Cibo Fan1,2, Lili Han1,2, Guang Chen1,2, Gang Chen1,2,(), Suo Zhao3,()   

  1. 1 Department of Gerneral Surgery, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700
    2 Department of Gerneral Surgery, The 1st Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700
    3 Department of Hepatobiliary, Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The 970th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Yantai Shandong Province 264000,China
  • Received:2026-01-28 Published:2026-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Gang Chen, Suo Zhao
引用本文:

袁强, 范慈勃, 韩丽丽, 陈光, 陈纲, 赵锁. 融合病理图像与报告的多模态模型用于乳腺癌预后预测[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 374-378.

Qiang Yuan, Cibo Fan, Lili Han, Guang Chen, Gang Chen, Suo Zhao. Multimodal model integrating pathological images and reports for breast cancer prognosis prediction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 374-378.

目的

利用TCGA-BRCA 公共数据集中乳腺癌患者的数字病理全切片图像(WSI) 数据和相对应的病理报告文本信息,搭建乳腺癌预后相关的预测模型,以期为临床决策提供可靠的参考。

方法

本研究使用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)中乳腺癌数据集(TCGA-BRCA),获得702例具有完整全切片病理图像(WSI)、对应病理报告文本和生存数据的样本。针对WSI高分辨率特性,采用形态学方法对组织区域进行分割,切割成图像块,构建多实例特征包;病理报告借助大语言模型(LLM)进行解析与结构化,提取关键的语义特征。在此基础上构建基于Transformer的多模态生存分析框架:图像分支通过改进的多实例学习和注意力机制兼顾全局与局部特征;文本分支将病理报告编码为语义嵌入。通过交叉注意力机制实现文本与图像特征的深度融合,最后经过全连接层输出为患者级生存风险分数,采用离散时间生存分析的负对数似然损失进行端到端训练。

结果

建立基于数字病理全切片图像(WSI)的单模态生存预测模型,采用多实例学习框架输出患者的复发风险评分与生存概率。通过5折交叉验证,模型的C指数达0.687,其性能显著优于以往文献报道的结果。进一步融合临床病理文本信息后,多模态模型的预测性能进一步提升:C指数提高至0.698,标准差由±0.046降至±0.022,降幅约50%,模型的稳定性与可靠性显著增强。

结论

本研究通过开发并验证一种新型多模态融合模型,可为乳腺癌患者的生存预测提供更为精准、可靠的解决方案。

Objective

To construct a high-accuracy, interpretable prognostic prediction model for breast cancer by integrating whole slide images (WSIs) and corresponding pathology report text from patients in the TCGA-BRCA public dataset, thereby providing a reliable auxiliary decision-making tool for clinical practice.

Methods

This study utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Cancer dataset (TCGA-BRCA). A total of 702 samples with complete WSIs, matched pathology reports, and survival data were obtained through stringent filtering. To handle the high resolution of WSIs, morphological methods were employed to segment tissue regions and partition them into image patches, constructing multi-instance feature bags. Pathology reports were parsed and structured using a large language model (LLM) to extract key semantic features. For model construction, a Transformer-based multimodal survival analysis framework was proposed: the image branch aggregated global and local features via improved multi-instance learning with an attention mechanism; the text branch encoded pathology reports into semantic embeddings. Deep fusion of textual and imaging features was achieved through a cross-attention mechanism. Finally, the output from the fully connected layer is a patient-level survival risk score, and the model is trained end-to-end using negative log-likelihood loss based on discrete-time survival analysis.

Results

This study first developed a unimodal survival prediction model based solely on digital pathology whole-slide images (WSIs), employing a multiple instance learning framework to generate patients' recurrence risk scores and survival probabilities. Through 5-fold cross-validation, the model achieved a C-index of 0.687, significantly outperforming previously reported results in the literature. Further integration of clinical and pathological text information further improved the performance of the multimodal model: the C-index increased to 0.698, and the standard deviation decreased from ±0.046 to ±0.022—a reduction of approximately 50%—indicating a significant enhancement in model stability and reliability.

Conclusion

By developing and validating a novel multimodal fusion model, this study provides a more accurate and reliable solution for survival prediction in breast cancer patients.

图1 多模态融合模型构建流程图
表1 乳腺癌预后预测模型实验结果对比
[1]
刘宗超,李哲轩,张阳,等. 2020全球癌症统计报告解读[J].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志20217(2): 1-14.
[2]
张雪,董晓平,管雅喆,等. 女性乳腺癌流行病学趋势及危险因素研究进展[J]. 肿瘤防治研究202148(1): 87-92.
[3]
张勇,余一朗,单鹏飞,等. 乳腺癌患者改良根治术后复发转移的相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(4): 418-421.
[4]
梁国刚,高薇丽,王群先,等. 208例T1-2N1M0期乳腺癌改良根治术患者无病生存情况的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(6): 604-607.
[5]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会,中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2026年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志202535(12): 1157-1255.
[6]
Jiang BBao LHe S,et al. Deep learning applications in breast cancer histopathological imaging: diagnosis,treatment,and prognosis[J]. Breast Cancer Res202426(1): 137.
[7]
Yang ZWei TLiang Y,et al. A foundation model for generalizable cancer diagnosis and survival prediction from histopathological images[J]. Nat Commun202516(1): 2366.
[8]
Sandarenu PMillar EKASong Y,et al. Survival prediction in triple negative breast cancer using multiple instance learning of histopathological images[J]. Sci Rep202212(1): 14527.
[9]
Wang QSun KLiu R,et al. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing of B-cell heterogeneity and tertiary lymphoid structure predicts breast cancer prognosis and neoadjuvant therapy efficacy[J]. Clin Transl Med202313(8): e1346.
[10]
Huang ZShao WHan Z,et al. Artificial intelligence reveals features associated with breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses from multi-stain histopathologic images[J]. NPJ Precis Oncol20237(1): 14.
[11]
Lu MYWilliamson DFKChen TY,et al. Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images[J]. Nature Biomedical Engineering20215(6): 555-570.
[12]
Zhou JTang JZuo Y,et al. Robust Multimodal Survival Prediction with Conditional Latent Differentiation Variational AutoEncoder[C]. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference 2025(pp. 10384-10393).
[13]
Zhou HZhou FChen H. Cohort-individual cooperative learning for multimodal cancer survival analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging202444(2): 656-667.
[14]
Liu PJi LGou J,et al. Interpretable Vision-Language Survival Analysis with Ordinal Inductive Bias for Computational Pathology[PP/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.093692024.
[15]
Yang SWang YChen H. Mambamil: Enhancing long sequence modeling with sequence reordering in computational pathology[C]. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention 2024(pp. 296-306).
[16]
Hemker KSimidjievski NJamnik M. Healnet: Multimodal fusion for heterogeneous biomedical data[C]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024(pp. 64479-64498).
[17]
Wang QSun KLiu R,et al. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing of B-cell heterogeneity and tertiary lymphoid structure predicts breast cancer prognosis and neoadjuvant therapy efficacy[J]. Clin Transl Med202313(8): e1346.
[18]
Huang XWang LGuo H,et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the regulative roles of cancer associated fibroblasts in tumor immune microenvironment of recurrent osteosarcoma[J]. Theranostics202212(13): 5877-5887.
[19]
Huang ZHChen LSun Y,et al. Conditional generative adversarial network driven radiomic prediction of mutation status based on magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer[J]. J Transl Med202422(1): 226.
[20]
Zhang MZhang FWang J,et al. Comprehensive characterization of stemness-related lncRNAs in triple-negative breast cancer identified a novel prognostic signature related to treatment outcomes,immune landscape analysis and therapeutic guidance: a silico analysis with in vivo experiments[J]. J Transl Med202422(1): 423.
[1] 王硕, 郑新宇. 乳腺癌术后同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的病理学认知与处理[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 133-137.
[2] 丁彩霞, 曲景辉, 裴英宏, 李静娜, 郑晓瑜, 徐岭植, 李思思. 基于RNA结合蛋白基因表达特征的乳腺癌预后预测模型构建及评价分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 138-147.
[3] 王美衡, 李杰, 陈策实, 许超汉. 乳腺癌串联重复表型的识别及分子功能特征分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 148-155.
[4] 范遥, 黄玉娥, 杨森果, 丁华, 张黔, 刘蜀. 线粒体基质导入因子23在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及其作用机制[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 156-162.
[5] 王静坤, 计美妮, 王玉凤, 宣浩军. 真空辅助乳腺活检与空芯针穿刺活检在乳腺癌诊断中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 163-168.
[6] 程妹, 金亚彬, 马丁瑞, 程昊, 詹玉莲, 周丹. 基于深度学习的MRI图像分析在乳腺癌诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 169-173.
[7] 宁海洋, 武春慧, 刘妍, 许慧娟, 高婷婷, 李炘正. 吲哚菁绿在乳腺癌外科诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 174-178.
[8] 黄家骏, 周奕延, 王斐然, 何志贤. 系统性红斑狼疮与乳腺癌关系的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 179-183.
[9] 闫文修, 党受琴, 穆亚男, 曹文荣. 乳腺滤泡树突细胞肉瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 184-186.
[10] 魏欣, 张雁瑞, 刘远欢, 杨怡晖, 汤红平. 乳腺原发性黏液表皮样癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 190-192.
[11] 樊蕊蕊, 高杰. 乳腺黏液性囊腺癌一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 193-195.
[12] 徐敏骅, 方圆, 朱丽均, 杨瑜麟. 女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查意愿及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 250-258.
[13] 张兆祺, 方燕, 刘德月, 丁淑宁, 王玮, 王敏, 刘俊, 朱丽. 单孔腔镜辅助精准保乳手术与传统保乳手术在早期乳腺癌中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 161-167.
[14] 何宇杭, 曹中伟. 中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比值与乳腺癌的关联性及预测效能研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 279-283.
[15] 田爱洁, 何晨熙, 孔凡庭. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后乳腺钼靶微钙化术前评估的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 284-288.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?