切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 510 -512. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.05.011

论著

外伤性脾破裂三阶梯分层治疗策略
张腾花1, 尚培中2,(), 王晓梅1, 李晓武2, 王金2, 苗建军2, 刘冰2   
  1. 1. 075000 河北 张家口,陆军第八十一集团军医院重症医学科
    2. 075000 河北 张家口,陆军第八十一集团军医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-08 出版日期:2024-10-26
  • 通信作者: 尚培中

Three-step stratified treatment strategy for traumatic splenic rupture

Tenghua Zhang1, Peizhong Shang2,(), Xiaomei Wang1, Xiaowu Li2, Jin Wang2, Jianjun Miao2, Bing Liu2   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zhangjiakou Hebei Province 075000, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the 81st Group Army Hospital of PLA, Zhangjiakou Hebei Province 075000, China
  • Received:2023-11-08 Published:2024-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Peizhong Shang
  • Supported by:
    Zhangjiakou?City?Key R & D Project for Hygiene, Health and Biomedicine(2322142D)
引用本文:

张腾花, 尚培中, 王晓梅, 李晓武, 王金, 苗建军, 刘冰. 外伤性脾破裂三阶梯分层治疗策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-512.

Tenghua Zhang, Peizhong Shang, Xiaomei Wang, Xiaowu Li, Jin Wang, Jianjun Miao, Bing Liu. Three-step stratified treatment strategy for traumatic splenic rupture[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 510-512.

目的

探讨外伤性脾破裂(TSR)三阶梯分层治疗策略对提高患者无创及微创治愈率的临床意义。

方法

回顾分析2013年7月至2022年9月107例非手术治疗和182例手术治疗的TSR患者临床资料,分析非手术、腹腔镜手术和开腹手术三种方法的治疗效果。应用SPSS 22.0处理数据,非正态计量资料采用[MQ1Q3)]表示,进行Wilcoxon秩和检验;计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,进行χ2Fisher确切概率法检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

年轻TSR患者耐受非手术治疗的机体应激能力强,术后恢复较快。他人打击伤有更多非手术治疗机会,其他各种受伤原因均不能作为选择治疗方式的依据,受伤严重程度是决定非手术治疗或手术治疗的关键因素。一阶梯非手术治疗107例,顺利康复103例,优良治愈(无并发症)率为96.3%;二阶梯腹腔镜手术治疗26例(包括非手术治疗组延迟性脾破裂出血改行腹腔镜脾切除2例),顺利完成手术24例,成功率为92.3%,顺利康复22例,优良治愈率为91.7%;三阶梯开腹手术治疗160例(包括腹腔镜中转开腹2例),顺利康复145例,优良治愈率为90.6%。

结论

多层螺旋CT是诊断TSR的首选方法,依据血流动力学、AAST-OIS分级、是否合并其他脏器伤等因素选择三阶梯分层治疗方法,有利于减少手术创伤及其并发症,提高无创及微创治愈率。

Objective

To explore the clinical significance of three-step stratified treatment strategy for traumatic splenic rupture (TSR) in improving the non-invasive and minimally invasive cure rate.

Methods

The clinical data of 107 patients with TSR treated non-surgically and 182 patients with TSR treated surgically from July 2013 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and the therapeutic effects of non-surgical, laparoscopic and open surgery were analyzed. SPSS 22.0 was used to process the data, and the non-normal measurement data were represented by [MQ1Q3)], and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was performed. The count data is represented by [cases (%)] and tested by χ2 or Fisher exact probability method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Young TSR patients have strong stress ability to tolerate non-surgical treatment and recover quickly after surgery. Other injuries have more opportunities for non-surgical treatment, and other causes of injury cannot be used as a basis for choosing treatment. The severity of injury is a key factor in determining non-surgical treatment or surgical treatment. In 107 cases, 103 cases recovered successfully and the rate of excellent cure (no complications) was 96.3%. Twenty-six cases were treated with two-step laparoscopic surgery (including 2 cases in the non-surgical treatment group who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for delayed splenic rupture and hemorrhage). 24 cases successfully completed the operation, the success rate was 92.3%, 22 cases successfully recovered, and the excellent cure rate was 91.7%. 160 cases were treated with three-step laparotomy (including 2 cases converted to laparotomy by laparoscopy), 145 cases recovered successfully, and the excellent cure rate was 90.6%.

Conclusion

Multi-slice spiral CT is the first choice for the diagnosis of TSR. The selection of three-step stratification treatment based on hemodynamics, AAST-OIS grading, whether there are other organ injuries, etc., is conducive to reducing surgical trauma and complications, and improving the non-invasive and minimally invasive cure rate.

表1 两组患者临床相关指标比较
表2 两组患者钝性闭合伤致伤原因比较[例(%)]
表3 外伤性脾破裂三阶梯治疗效果比较[例(%)]
[1]
包磊.腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的疗效对比[J].当代临床医刊2023,36(04):10-12.
[2]
Morell-Hofert DPrimavesi FFodor M,et al.Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries[J].Eur Radiol2020,30(12):6570-6581.
[3]
张卫,谭建平.多层螺旋CT联合介入栓塞术在创伤性肝脾破裂出血中的应用[J].影像研究与医学应用2023,7(04):183-185.
[4]
石玉玲,黄家喜,林德齐.彩色多普勒超声在外伤性脾破裂诊断及治疗中的应用价值[J].医疗装备2023,36(06):85-87.
[5]
Spittle ABritcliffe AHamilton MJ. Splenic trauma in the Northern Territory:the impact of an interventional radiology service on splenic trauma management and outcomes[J].Heliyon2023,9(6):e16993.
[6]
张孔玺,李小红,李越洲,等.选择性脾动脉栓塞术与传统开腹手术治疗外伤性脾破裂安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版)2022,16(06):452-460.
[7]
余曦,范伟,张磊冰.腹腔穿刺置管引流在肝脾外伤非手术治疗中的效果分析[J].贵州医药2023,47(06):928-929.
[8]
杨燕茹,王琳,吴安琪.腹腔镜引导二级脾蒂离断切脾术在创伤性脾损伤患者中的临床效果和价值[J].中华全科医学2021,19(01):35-37,58.
[9]
李国松,李大华,宋国杰,等.腹腔镜脾切除术在外伤性脾破裂中的应用价值[J].昆明医科大学学报2023,44(09):86-92.
[10]
张菊梅,黄玉荣,王迪迪,等.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症中对脾蒂血管的不同处理方式比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022,16(06):643-646.
[11]
陈亚峰,李江斌,王栋,等.腹腔镜脾切除术在巨脾脾动脉栓塞后远期治疗中的应用[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2023,17(05):571-574.
[12]
刘冰,王晓梅,宋创业,等.严重创伤性肝损伤患者死亡危险因素分析及早期预测模型的建立与验证[J].中华创伤杂志2023,39(06):528-537.
[13]
尚培中,李晓武,苗建军,等.肝外胆管外伤个体化救治18例临床分析[J].中国现代普通外科进展2021,24(09):729-731.
[14]
吕瑞昌,尚培中,李晓武,等.胰腺损伤临床救治及胰漏预防研究进展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2023,17(03):336-339.
[15]
危志远,刘珞,傅志雄,等.脾外伤分级评估及诊治现状[J/OL].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志2022,11(01):1-4.
[1] 曹楣汾, 李琼, 凌花, 陆勇, 戴新贵. RETRA评分在ICU收治创伤患者中的应用[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 130-135.
[2] 赵智勇, 闫玉昌, 关磊, 金淑溶, 潘振宇. 多层螺旋CT并多平面重建技术在非裂孔性膈疝与膈膨升术前诊断中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 228-233.
[3] 王颖, 吴德平, 刘煜, 刘国栋. miR-9-5p下调CXCR4减轻创伤性脑损伤大鼠的神经炎症和细胞凋亡[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 65-72.
[4] 张薇, 郭姗姗. 轻型创伤性脑损伤远期后遗症流行病学的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 117-121.
[5] 王如海, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 孙菲琳, 杨震. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者术后慢性意识障碍的危险因素及其预测价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 78-83.
[6] 鹿海龙, 朱玉辐, 贺雪凤, 蔡廷江, 王栋, 朱圣玲, 张恩刚, 王策. 创伤性颅脑损伤二次手术的危险因素分析及预警模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 97-101.
[7] 闫伟, 张建民. 创伤性视神经损伤诊治进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 1-5.
[8] 刘彪, 巍山, 关永胜. 基于Rotterdam CT评分及凝血功能指标的创伤性颅脑损伤预后预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 22-27.
[9] 朱先理, 王守森. 大语言模型在创伤性脑损伤病历书写的应用前景[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 55-57.
[10] 景方坤, 李岩峰. 颅脑创伤后慢性意识障碍促醒外科治疗的现状与展望[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 129-132.
[11] 王绅, 王如海, 李春, 杨震, 孙菲琳. 中重型颅脑创伤患者住院时间延长的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 146-153.
[12] 王燕, 梁海乾, 郭姗姗. 炎症小体在创伤性脑损伤中作用的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 177-181.
[13] 胡贤瑞, 伍振国, 何竟. 高压氧治疗创伤性脑损伤患者认知功能障碍疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 21-36.
[14] 宁波, 左歆烨, 关凯跃, 赵晨怡, 刘震宇, 翟浩琪, 令狐恩强. 便携式笔记本一次性大孔道内镜用于动物腹部战创伤内异物取出及止血可行性及安全性研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 28-32.
[15] 倪沂江, 张伟亚, 蒋伟, 秦辉. 一体化创伤中心对严重多发伤患者救治质量的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 21-25.
阅读次数
全文


摘要