切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 264 -267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.03.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合胰十二指肠切除术临床效果研究
罗耀兵1, 徐小立2,()   
  1. 1. 445000 湖北恩施,湖北省恩施土家族苗族自治州名族医院急诊外科
    2. 445000 湖北恩施,湖北省恩施土家族苗族自治州名族医院120急救中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-11 出版日期:2020-06-26
  • 通信作者: 徐小立

Clinical application of modified end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa in PD

Yaobing Luo1, Xiaoli Xu2,()   

  1. 1. Emergency surgery Department, famous Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei Province, Enshi 445000, Hubei
    2. First Aid Center of famous nationality Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous prefectures, Hubei Province, Enshi 445000, Hubei
  • Received:2019-10-11 Published:2020-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoli Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Xiaoli, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Hubei Health and Planning Commission Fund Project(WJ2017H551)
引用本文:

罗耀兵, 徐小立. 改良胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合胰十二指肠切除术临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 264-267.

Yaobing Luo, Xiaoli Xu. Clinical application of modified end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa in PD[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 264-267.

目的

探讨改良胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合的胰十二指肠切除术临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年3月62例行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者临床资料,其中30例行改良胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合术(改良组),32例行传统胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合术(传统组)。选用SPSS 20.00统计学软件进行数据分析,围术期相关指标和术后第1、3、5、7、9 d的腹腔引流液淀粉酶水平用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症发生率采用χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

改良组出血量明显小于传统组(P<0.05),其余相关围术期指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);改良组术后发生1例胰瘘明显小于传统组9例(P<0.05),其中改良组B级胰瘘发生率明显小于传统组(P<0.05),生化瘘、C级胰瘘发生率、淋巴瘘、胃排空发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者腹腔引流液淀粉酶含量在术后第1、3、5、7、9 d的检测期间内,传统组腹腔引流液淀粉酶含量小于改良组(P<0.05)。

结论

改良胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合术相比于传统胰管空肠黏膜端侧吻合术在PD中能有效降低胰瘘的发生率,具有一定的临床推广价值。

Objective

To investigate the effect of modified end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa in pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

62 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, which included 30 patients with modified end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa (modified group) and 32 cases of traditional end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa (traditional group). SPSS 20.00 statistical software was used for analysis. The postoperative complications of the two groups, the postoperative complications of pancreatic fistula, and the level of amylase in the abdominal drainage fluid at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 days after operation were observed. The complication and other count data were expressed in n%, and compared with Fisher exact probability method or χ2 test, perioperative indicators were expressed as (±s), and compared with t test. P<0.05 was a statistical difference.

Results

The amount of bleeding in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the other surgical indexes (P>0.05). In the modified group, 1 case of pancreatic fistula was significantly smaller than 9 cases in the traditional group (P<0.05). The incidence of grade B pancreatic fistula in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (P<0.05), and the difference of incidence of biochemical fistula and C-class pancreatic fistula between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The contents of amylase in the abdominal drainage fluid of the two groups of patients was less than those in the modified group during the 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 d postoperative detection period.

Conclusion

Compared with the end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa, the modified end-to-side anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa can effectively reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula in PD, and has certain clinical promotion value.

表1 62例行PD患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 62例行PD患者不同术式两组患者手术指标比较(±s)
表3 62例行PD患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症情况比较(例)
图1 62例行PD患者不同术式两组患者腹腔引流液淀粉酶含量的比较
[1]
Xiong J, Szatmary P, Huang W,et al.Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2016,95(18):e3497.
[2]
Katz MG, Fenton SJ, Russell KW,et al.Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal injuries in children[J].Pediatr Surg Int,2018,34(6):641-645.
[3]
周辉年,俞泽元,杨含腾,等.两种胰肠吻合术在胰十二指肠切除术中应用的对比研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(9):1095-1101.
[4]
戴梦华.腹腔镜下半旋转胰头动脉优先入路胰十二指肠切除术的临床意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):275-278.
[5]
黄鹤光,林荣贵.腹腔镜前入路静脉优先与右后入路动脉优先联合切除钩突的优势[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(4):279-282.
[6]
孙备,陈宏泽.胰十二指肠切除术后腹腔引流管合理应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36 (8):915-917.
[7]
Besselink MG, van Rijssen LB, Bassi C,et al.Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation:A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery[J].Surgery,2017,161(2):365-372.
[8]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C,et al.The 2016 update of the International Study Group definition and grading of Postoperative pancreatic fistula:11 years after [J].Surgery, 2017, 161(3):584-591.
[9]
Chen JS, Liu G, Li TR,et al.Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy:Risk factors and preventive strategies [J].J Cancer Res Ther,2019,15(4):857-863.
[10]
赵战强,王龙鑫,姜洪池,等.胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空障碍危险因素分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36 (8):897-900.
[11]
张志磊,张萌,彭利,等.350例胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的相关危险因素分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017, 27(26):75-78.
[12]
Strobel O, Brangs S, Hinz U,et al.Incidence, risk factors and clinical implications of chyle leak after pancreatic surgery[J].Br J Surg,2017,104 (1):108-117.
[13]
马春龙,韩玮.胰十二指肠切除术后腹腔引流液淀粉酶水平对B、C级胰瘘预测作用的探讨[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2019,26(8):939-942.
[14]
Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Abu Hilal M,et al.Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms:the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference[J].Surg Endosc, 2017,31(5):2023-2041.
[15]
van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K,et al.Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2) : a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial[J].Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol,2019,4 (3) :199-207.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[3] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[4] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[5] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[6] 史成宇, 季晓琳, 田莉莹, 张来香. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中第14c/d组淋巴结清扫在胰头癌中的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 430-433.
[7] 孙丕绛, 李剑波, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路扩大清扫的胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-249.
[8] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[9] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[10] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[11] 陈卫波, 朱玉文, 杨豪, 陆泽坤, 邬迪, 祖广晨, 张悦, 陈学敏. 一种改良胰肠吻合方式安全性及其在腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术中应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 498-503.
[12] 滕达, 许悦, 张萌. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 537-542.
[13] 廖艳, 成伟. 腹腔镜技术在胰腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 259-264.
[14] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[15] 李琴, 莫伟, 周碧芳, 李玉莲, 阳秀春. 经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术后患者指南健康问题清单的构建[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 386-391.
阅读次数
全文


摘要