切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 309 -311. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.04.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

微创食管癌根治术对老年患者肺部感染与T淋巴细胞亚群及MMP-9的影响
蔡爱兵1, 张鹏1, 沈祯云1,(), 柯杨2   
  1. 1. 100012 北京 ,航空总医院 胸心血管外科
    2. 100032 北京市肿瘤防治研究所
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-27 出版日期:2018-08-26
  • 通信作者: 沈祯云

Influence of minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection on pulmonary infection, T lymphocyte subsets and MMP-9 in elderly patients

Aibing Cai1, Peng Zhang1, Zhenyun Shen1,(), Yang Ke2   

  1. 1. Department of cardiovascular thoracic surgery, Aviation general hospital, Beijing 100012 China
    2. Beijing Institute of Cancer Research, Beijing 100032
  • Received:2018-04-27 Published:2018-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhenyun Shen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shen Zhenyun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation(NO.30430710)
引用本文:

蔡爱兵, 张鹏, 沈祯云, 柯杨. 微创食管癌根治术对老年患者肺部感染与T淋巴细胞亚群及MMP-9的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 309-311.

Aibing Cai, Peng Zhang, Zhenyun Shen, Yang Ke. Influence of minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection on pulmonary infection, T lymphocyte subsets and MMP-9 in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 309-311.

目的

探讨微创食管癌根治术对老年患者术后肺部感染、T淋巴细胞亚群及MMP-9的影响。

方法

选取2015年1月到2017年12月98例老年食管癌患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为微创组(实施微创胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术)和传统组(实施传统食管癌根治术)。应用SPSS 19.0统计软件进行数据分析,术中术后指标、T细胞亚群、MMP-9水平指标以均值±标准差表示,组间比较采用独立t检验;术后肺部感染及死亡发生率指标,组间比较采用χ2检验。以P<0.05认为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

微创组患者手术各项指标(手术切口平均总长度、平均手术时间、手术出血量、术后住院天数)均优于传统组患者(P<0.05);微创组术后肺部感染率6.1%(3/49)明显低于传统组26.5%(13/49),P<0.05;微创组患者术后第1天、3天T细胞亚群的各项指标的水平(CD3、CD4、CD4/CD8)均高于传统组(P<0.05);微创组术后第1天、3天MMP-9水平均低于传统组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

老年食管癌患者行微创胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术效果更好,可明显减轻手术创伤,改善外周血T淋巴细胞亚群及血清MMP-9水平,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the influence of minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection on pulmonary infection, T lymphocyte subsets and MMP-9 in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 98 patients with elderly esophageal cancer from January 2015 to September 2017 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly divided into minimally invasive group and traditional group by using random number table method. The minimally invasive group was treated with minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical surgery, while the traditional group was treated with conventional esophagectomy. Surgical indicators, the incidence of postoperative lung infection, the level of T cell subsets and MMP-9 were observed and compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS19.0 software. The surgical incision, operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, T-cell subsets, and MMP-9 levels were expressed as (±s), and were examined by using t test.The death rate was analyzed by Chi-square test. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The surgical indexes (average total length of the surgical incision, average operation time, amount of blood loss, postoperative hospital stay) in minimally invasive group were better than those in traditional group, with significant difference (P<0.05); The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection in the minimally invasive group was 6.1%(3/49), significantly lower than 26.5%(13/49) in traditional group (P<0.05); 1 and 3 days after surgery, the levels of T-cell subgroups (CD3+ , CD4+ , CD4+ /CD8+ ) in minimally invasive group were higher than those of traditional group (P<0.05); The levels of MMP-9 in minimally invasive group was lower than in traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is better. It could significantly reduce the surgical trauma, and improve the peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets and serum MMP-9 levels. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 98例老年食管癌患者不同手术方法两组患者一般资料比较(±s,例)
表2 98例老年食管癌患者不同手术方法两组患者手术相关指标的比较(±s)
表3 98例老年食管癌患者不同手术方法两组患者手术前后MMP-9水平(ng/ml,±s)
[1]
王实,李兆申,崔钊,等. 食管黏膜病变术前胃镜活检及内镜黏膜下剥离术术后病理的异同[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2015, 32(7):432-434.
[2]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 医院感染诊断标准(试行)[J]. 中华医学杂志,2001, 81(5):314-320.
[3]
Ferlay J, Wild CP, Bray F. The Burden of Cancer Worldwide: Current and Future Perspectives[J]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ,2017.
[4]
莫家伟. 胸腹腔镜微创手术与开放手术对食管癌患者术后早期肺功能的影响[J]. 河北医药,2013, 35(12):1806-1808.
[5]
马胡赛,蔡奕欣,张霓,等. 胸、腹腔镜食管癌根治术治疗老年食管癌患者的疗效观察[J]. 现代医学,2015,43(1):27-30.
[6]
崔文峰,曹纪伟,巴玉峰. 胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术对老年食管癌患者肺功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 肿瘤学杂志,2017, 23(9):823-826.
[7]
文玉琴,何丽,李丽霞,等. 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术患者感染预防与控制研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2016, 26(1):98-99,105.
[8]
张波,陈保富,金将,等. 腔镜联合食管癌根治术后合并肺部感染危险因素分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2013, 23(6):1349-1350,1358.
[9]
朱宇飞,吴涛,徐健,等.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对重症急性胰腺炎外周血T淋巴细胞亚群的影响比较[J].河北医学,2017,23(3):387-390.
[10]
陈世君,王勇强,张聃,等.结直肠癌腹腔镜手术对患者免疫球蛋白水平及可溶性NKG2D配体表达的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(2):252-256.
[11]
杨德娟,韩波.IL-21及其受体在自身免疫性疾病中的作用[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2016,18(5):466-471.
[12]
肖鹏,冯睿婷,梅家转,等.IL-21增强CIK细胞对食管癌EC9706细胞的杀伤作用及其可能的机制[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2017,24(11):1266-1270.
[13]
Bhattacharya R, Ye XC, Wang R,et al.Intracrine VEGF signaling mediates the activity of prosurvival pathways in human colorectal cancer cell[J].Cancer research,2016,76(10):3014-3024.
[14]
Annahazi A, Abraham S, Farkas K,et al.A pliot study on faecal MMP-9:a mew noninvasive diagnostic marker of colorectal cancer[J].British journal of cancer,2016,114(7):787-792.
[15]
Araujo RF Jr, Lira GA, Vilaca JA,et al.Prognostic and diagnostic implications of MMP-2,MMP-9,and VEGF-a expressions in colorectal cancer[J].Pathology-Research and Practice,2015,211(1):71-77.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[3] 李世杰, 申传安. 烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者呼吸机相关肺炎的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 351-355.
[4] 张胜伟, 孟召路, 热汗古丽·吾休尔, 万世森, 闫鹏, 阳乔. 肺炎支原体诱发反应性感染性皮疹黏膜疹一例[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 309-313.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[7] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[8] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[9] 于燕兴, 梅喜庆, 刘凤娟, 于梓薇, 许亚慧, 徐飞. 高通量测序重症肺炎肺泡灌洗液病原体的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 785-788.
[10] 刘雯, 赵明栋, 夏伟, 潘以雄. 不同剂量比阿培南治疗重症肺炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 789-792.
[11] 刘春军, 严方方, 王宝锋, 常婷婷, 郭红红, 李志强. 替加环素联合人免疫球蛋白治疗XDRAB致VAP 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 797-800.
[12] 胡菊英, 李银华, 洪兰, 王宏勇, 丁先军, 李承美, 谭心海. 儿童感染大叶性肺炎与支气管肺炎临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 813-816.
[13] 晏彦, 杨军, 周凤兰, 孙登昆, 陈玉. 哌拉西林他唑巴坦和哌拉西林舒巴坦治疗细菌性肺炎的倾向性匹配分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 817-819.
[14] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[15] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
阅读次数
全文


摘要