切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 268 -270. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.026

所属专题: 文献

论著

解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效评价
胡伟1, 张桢1,(), 沈丰1, 周文波1   
  1. 1. 442000 湖北十堰,湖北医药学院附属东风医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-25 出版日期:2018-06-26
  • 通信作者: 张桢

The recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis

Wei Hu1, Zhen Zhang1,(), Feng Shen1, Wenbo Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongfeng Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College, Shiyan Hubei 442000, China
  • Received:2017-09-25 Published:2018-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhen Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Zhen, Email:
引用本文:

胡伟, 张桢, 沈丰, 周文波. 解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 268-270.

Wei Hu, Zhen Zhang, Feng Shen, Wenbo Zhou. The recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 268-270.

目的

评价解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年6月至2015年6月86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为解剖性肝切除组40例和非解剖性肝切除组46例,采用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计学分析,手术相关指标及术后恢复指标以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验,结石复发率根据Kaplan-meier法计算并绘制无结石复发生存曲线,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

解剖性肝切除组术中出血量(426.7±23.5) ml及患者住院时间(7.2±0.4) d均明显少于非解剖性肝切除组(673.1±48.5) ml及(8.3±0.9) d,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。解剖性肝切除组患者术后胆漏、切面感染及结石复发的发生均明显少于非解剖性肝切除组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。86例患者均随访到术后24个月,解剖性肝切除组有1例患者(2.5%)术后13个月发生了结石残留,非解剖性肝切除组术后有18例患者(39.1%)发生了结石残留,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

解剖性肝切除这种符合肝脏生理结构的外科切除更能够减少患者术中出血量,缩短患者住院时间,防止结石复发。

Objective

To evaluate the recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of forty hospitalized anatomical hepatectomy patients and forty-six non-anatomical hepatectomy patients from June 2013 to June 2015. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS19.0 software. Measurement data were expressed as and were compared by student’s t test, the recurrence rate of the stones was calculated according to kaplan-meier method to drawn the survival curve, and the survival rate was compared with the Log-rank test. Post-operative complication rate was compared by chi-square test. P less than 0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

The intra-operative blood, hospital stays postoperative biliary leakage, surface infection and recurrence of stones in anatomical hepatectomy group were significantly less than the non-anatomical hepatectomy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 86 patients were followed up for 24 months, one patient (2.5%) in the anatomical hepatectomy group had stone residue 13 months after surgery, while 18 patients (39.1%) in the non-anatomical hepatectomy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Anatomical hepatectomy which is in accordance with the physiological structure of the liver can reduce the intra-operative blood, hospital stays and prevent the recurrence of stones.

表1 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者临床基线资料比较(±s,例)
表2 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者术中术后情况比较(±s)
图1 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者术后24个月结石复发率
[1]
KIM, Hyo Jung, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma risk as long-term outcome after hepatic resection in the hepatolithiasis patients[J]. World journal of surgery, 2015, 39(6):1537-1542.
[2]
Tazuma S, Nakanuma Y. Clinical features of hepatolithiasis: analyses of multicenter-based surveys in Japan[J]. Lipids in health and disease. 2015,14(1):129.
[3]
周力学. 解剖性肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石的临床研究[J].中国医学工程,2013,2(21):34-35.
[4]
王坚.复杂肝内胆管结石的诊断与处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,03(36):292-295.
[5]
蒋辉,丁兵,张瑜等.解剖性肝切除和肝组织切开取石治疗区域型肝内胆管结石[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,08(31):643-646.
[6]
刘天锡,方登华,关斌颖等.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,01(17):38-40.
[7]
修典荣,王港.肝胆管病的诊治原则[J].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(6):454-457.
[8]
向飞,李付磊,金小顺. 解剖性肝切除术研究进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2017, 29(5):433-436.
[9]
胡建军,董家鸿. 肝内胆管结石的外科治疗研究进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(4):296-299.
[10]
LI, Chuan; WEN, Tianfu. Surgical management of hepatolithiasis: A minireview. Intractable & rare diseases research, 2017, 6(2):102-105.
[11]
刘臣海,黄强,邵成颂等.解剖性肝切除治疗复发性肝胆管结石[J].腹部外科,2015,5(28):326-328.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[3] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[4] 刘连新, 孟凡征. 不断提高腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-358.
[5] 戴朝六, 赵阳. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除应该重视的几个问题[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 359-362.
[6] 陆朝阳, 金也, 孙备. 腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的发展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-366.
[7] 张翼翔, 马明, 田金龙, 杨珊珊, 尚程程, 张景欣. 腹腔镜肝叶切除联合胆道镜取石治疗肝内胆管结石的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 381-384.
[8] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[9] 唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[10] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[11] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[12] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[13] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[14] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
[15] 徐森胤, 黄斌, 郭绍锋, 王涵. 超声造影引导下关节囊内注射治疗老年粘连性关节囊炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 24-27.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?