切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 268 -270. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.03.026

所属专题: 文献

论著

解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效评价
胡伟1, 张桢1,(), 沈丰1, 周文波1   
  1. 1. 442000 湖北十堰,湖北医药学院附属东风医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-25 出版日期:2018-06-26
  • 通信作者: 张桢

The recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis

Wei Hu1, Zhen Zhang1,(), Feng Shen1, Wenbo Zhou1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongfeng Hospital Affiliated to Hubei Medical College, Shiyan Hubei 442000, China
  • Received:2017-09-25 Published:2018-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhen Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Zhen, Email:
引用本文:

胡伟, 张桢, 沈丰, 周文波. 解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 268-270.

Wei Hu, Zhen Zhang, Feng Shen, Wenbo Zhou. The recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 268-270.

目的

评价解剖性肝切除治疗区域型肝内胆管结石的近期及远期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年6月至2015年6月86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为解剖性肝切除组40例和非解剖性肝切除组46例,采用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计学分析,手术相关指标及术后恢复指标以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验,结石复发率根据Kaplan-meier法计算并绘制无结石复发生存曲线,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

解剖性肝切除组术中出血量(426.7±23.5) ml及患者住院时间(7.2±0.4) d均明显少于非解剖性肝切除组(673.1±48.5) ml及(8.3±0.9) d,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。解剖性肝切除组患者术后胆漏、切面感染及结石复发的发生均明显少于非解剖性肝切除组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。86例患者均随访到术后24个月,解剖性肝切除组有1例患者(2.5%)术后13个月发生了结石残留,非解剖性肝切除组术后有18例患者(39.1%)发生了结石残留,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

解剖性肝切除这种符合肝脏生理结构的外科切除更能够减少患者术中出血量,缩短患者住院时间,防止结石复发。

Objective

To evaluate the recent and long-term effects of anatomical hepatectomy and non-anatomical hepatectomy for regional hepatolithiasis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of forty hospitalized anatomical hepatectomy patients and forty-six non-anatomical hepatectomy patients from June 2013 to June 2015. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS19.0 software. Measurement data were expressed as and were compared by student’s t test, the recurrence rate of the stones was calculated according to kaplan-meier method to drawn the survival curve, and the survival rate was compared with the Log-rank test. Post-operative complication rate was compared by chi-square test. P less than 0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

The intra-operative blood, hospital stays postoperative biliary leakage, surface infection and recurrence of stones in anatomical hepatectomy group were significantly less than the non-anatomical hepatectomy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). 86 patients were followed up for 24 months, one patient (2.5%) in the anatomical hepatectomy group had stone residue 13 months after surgery, while 18 patients (39.1%) in the non-anatomical hepatectomy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Anatomical hepatectomy which is in accordance with the physiological structure of the liver can reduce the intra-operative blood, hospital stays and prevent the recurrence of stones.

表1 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者临床基线资料比较(±s,例)
表2 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者术中术后情况比较(±s)
图1 86例区域型肝内胆管结石患者不同术式两组患者术后24个月结石复发率
[1]
KIM, Hyo Jung, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma risk as long-term outcome after hepatic resection in the hepatolithiasis patients[J]. World journal of surgery, 2015, 39(6):1537-1542.
[2]
Tazuma S, Nakanuma Y. Clinical features of hepatolithiasis: analyses of multicenter-based surveys in Japan[J]. Lipids in health and disease. 2015,14(1):129.
[3]
周力学. 解剖性肝切除治疗肝内胆管结石的临床研究[J].中国医学工程,2013,2(21):34-35.
[4]
王坚.复杂肝内胆管结石的诊断与处理[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,03(36):292-295.
[5]
蒋辉,丁兵,张瑜等.解剖性肝切除和肝组织切开取石治疗区域型肝内胆管结石[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,08(31):643-646.
[6]
刘天锡,方登华,关斌颖等.腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,01(17):38-40.
[7]
修典荣,王港.肝胆管病的诊治原则[J].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(6):454-457.
[8]
向飞,李付磊,金小顺. 解剖性肝切除术研究进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2017, 29(5):433-436.
[9]
胡建军,董家鸿. 肝内胆管结石的外科治疗研究进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(4):296-299.
[10]
LI, Chuan; WEN, Tianfu. Surgical management of hepatolithiasis: A minireview. Intractable & rare diseases research, 2017, 6(2):102-105.
[11]
刘臣海,黄强,邵成颂等.解剖性肝切除治疗复发性肝胆管结石[J].腹部外科,2015,5(28):326-328.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 刘波, 涂志坚, 李传富, 李江涛, 陈国栋. 机器人解剖性左半肝切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 486-486.
[3] 廖玥, 王可, 秦江月, 吴艳秋, 陈俊, 汪涛, 文富强, 王浩. 丹龙口服液治疗轻中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的多中心及前瞻性研究[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 306-311.
[4] 邱朋, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 肝内胆管结石微创治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 591-596.
[5] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[6] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[7] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[10] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[11] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[12] 董骏, 吴芳芳. mFOLFOX6与FOLFOX4化疗方案治疗直肠癌的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[13] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[14] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
[15] 范勇, 张利昉, 杨美琳. 改良经口内镜下贲门缩窄术治疗胃食管反流病效果分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 65-68.
阅读次数
全文


摘要